Telangana High Court
WP/1991/2013 of N. Pullaiah Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on 31 December 2021
rr,E SI r s p ;; i i |lfl,fi I : ::!,W Ar H YD E RABA D FRIDAY, THE THIRTY flRST DAY OF DECEIIBER Two rHousAND AND TWENTy oruE - PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETIT N NO: 1991 0F 2013 ""T"ii.P,"ui:!.,i19,I4? Venkat Ramuru a.eed
HIGH COURT FOR rr,E SI
rr,E SISIr [s ][p ];; i i |lfl,fi I : ::!,W [Ar ][H YD ]E RABA D
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY flRST DAY OF DECEIIBERTwo rHousAND AND TWENTy oruE [-]Two rHousAND AND TWENTy oruE [-]
PRESENT
THE HON,BLE [DT. ][JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER]
N NO:[1991 ][0][F 2013]
WRIT PETIT
""T"ii.P,"ui:!.,i19,I4? [Venkat Ramuru ][a.eed ]e-93:t*fr{,iflii;",'"% [t1ii3i'*r1]' il.Nio:'i-56-s tlnEliisna Kanthi [Nasar' ][lbrahiml]2. ' chathara ;;Ii.N". q-zd,x^ppa J+gqluh, [s/o ]Pahail [saveru ]lbrahimpatnam [chathara' ]"s99"6:%Tf$J""fii [vrll]f.hlotY.',Si"
'"PETITIONERS
ANDI The Greater [HYde]rabad tvlunicipal [Corporation' ][Rep][ by its ][Commissioner, Tank]Bund, HYderabad'Greater [Hyderabad Municipal Corporation]I The Greater [HYde]rabad tvlunicipal [Corporation' ][Rep][ by its ][Commissioner, Tank]Bund, HYderabad'Greater [Hyderabad Municipal Corporation]2The DeDutv [Municipal Commissioner']r-. [g, ]Nla;ar [Circle. ][HYderabad']MuniciPal [CorPoration,]r-. [g, ]Nla;ar [Circle. ][HYderabad']MuniciPal [CorPoration,]3The Zonal [Commissioner, ][East ][Zone' ][Greater ][Hyderabad]Gaddiannaram, [HYderabad']ior. r/o P.No. [391, ][N.P']Gaddiannaram, [HYderabad']ior. r/o P.No. [391, ][N.P']4Smt. S.lrrluniswari [Devi, ][w/o ][V'shravan ][Kumar' aged ][ma]bdy District.Teachers Colony. [Barramargud'a ][Siroo'nagar' ][Ranga ][Re]Teachers Colony. [Barramargud'a ][Siroo'nagar' ][Ranga ][Re]
...RESPONDENTS
Petition [under Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances [stated ][in ][the ][affidavit ][filed therewith' the ][High ][Court ][may be ][pleased]to issue [an appropriate ][Writ' ][Order ][or Direction' ][more particularly one in ][the ][nature]of writ of [rvrandamus, ][decraring ][the ][action ][of ][the ][respondent authorities in ][not ][taking]anyactionontherepresentationdtT'1'2Ol3submittedbythepetitionersfordemolition [of ][the ilegar and ][unauthorized structures made by ][the.4th ][respondent ][in]Plot belonging [to ][the ][petitioners bearing Plot ][No ][391' ][Sy No ][59/1 (Old ][Sy ][No ][59](P), admeasuring [150 ][Sq ][Yds ]' [Ward No'B' ][Block ][No ][7' ][situated ][at ][Teachers]Colony, [Phase-1, ][Karmanghat ][village' ][Saroornagar ][tvlandal' ][R'R' ][District' ][as ][being]illegal, arbitrary' [unjust and ][u ][nco ][nstitutio ][na ][I and ][consequently demolish ][the ][above]said structures.
WPMP.[N][O:2409]F 201
Petition under [Section 151 CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit [filed ][in ][support ][of the petition' ][the ][High ][Court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][pass]
olders direcling the Respondent authorities to forthwith consider and take,'/appropriate action pursuant to the representation dt.7-1-2013, pending disposar ofthe main Writ petitionappropriate action pursuant to the representation dt.7-1-2013, pending disposar ofthe main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. JOSEPH
counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: sRr SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDyS.C. FOR GHMC
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI V. ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY
The Court made the following: ORDER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTTCE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRrT [pETfTTON ]No.r991 OF 2ots
This writ Petition, under Articre 226 of the constitution of India,is filed by the petitioners, wherein the following prayer is made:
"...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaring the action of the respondent authorities in nottaking any action on the representation dt.07.01.2013submitted by the petitioners for demolition of the illegaland unauthorized structures made by the 4threspondent in Plot belonging to the petitioners bearingPlot No.391, Sy.No.59/1 (old Sy.No.59(P),admeasuring 150 Sq. Yds. Ward No.B, BIock No.7,situated at Teachers Colony, Phase-I, KarmanghatVillage, Saroornagar f4andal, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict, [as]being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and [unconstitutional ][and]consequently direct the respondent authorities [to]disconnect the [power ]supply to the [above ][said]premises and to grant such other relief or reliefs-.."
2. Heard the learned counsel [for ]the [petitioners, ][learned ][Standing]Counsel for GHMC appearing [for the ][respondent ][Nos.1 ][to 3, ][learned]counsel for respondent [No'4 ][and ][perused ][the ][record.]
3. Learned counsel for the [petitioners ][would submit ][that ][the]petitioners are the absolute owners of [plot ][No'391, ][Sy'No'59/1]situated at Teachers [Colony, Phase-I, ][Karmanghat ][Village,]Saroornagar [Mandal, ][Ranga Reddy ][District, having ][purchased ][the]same under a registered [sale ][deed ][dated ][24.12'20L2 ][vide ][document]No.16394/2012. The unofficial [respondent ][No'4 ][without ][having ][any]manner of right and title, [trespassed ][into ][the ][subject property ][and]
with [the ][construction ][without ][obtaining ][any ][permission]proceeded from the [respondent ][authorities' ][Hence' ][the ][petitioner made ][a]representation [dated 07.01.2013 ][to ][the ][respondent ][No'2 ][to ][demolish]the illegal construction [made ][by ][respondent ][No.4 ][over ][the ][subject]property. The said representation [has ][not ][been ][disposed ][of yet']
4. There is no deniat by the [learned Standing ][Counsel ][for ][GHlvlC]with regard to the submission of [representation ][dated 07.01.2013 ][by]no action [has ][been ][taken ][on the ][said]the petitioner. Admittedly, representation.
5. Under these circumstances, the respondent No.2 is directed toexamine the representation dated 07.01.2A13 of the petitioner anddispose of the same, in accordance with law, after affordingopportunity to the petitioner, unofficial respondent No.4 and otherinterested persons. It is made clear that the respondent authoritiesare entitled to remove the encroachments, if any, in accordance withlaw.
6. With the above direction, this Writ petition is disposed of.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petitionshall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/.K. AMMAJIASSISTANT REGISTBARsEcloN 8{or*
//TRUE COPY//sEcloN 8{or*sEcloN 8{or*1. The Commissioner,Greater Hyderabad lVlunicipal Corporation, Tank Bund,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
To,
2. The.Deputy lVlunicipal commissioner, Greater Hyderabad lVlunicipal corporationL.B.Nagar Circle, Hyderabad.L.B.Nagar Circle, Hyderabad.
3. The Zonal commissioner, East Zone, Greater Hyderabad t\.4unicipal corporation,Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad.Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad.4. One CC to SRI K. JOSEPH, Advocate tOpUCl
5. One CC to SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, S.C. for GHIMC [OPUC][OPUC]
6. One CC to SRI V. ESWARATAH CHOWDARY, Advocate tOpUCltOpUCl
7. Two CD Copies.
8. One Spare Copy.
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:31 [11212021]
ORDERWP.No.1991 of 2013
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS@d,oVL^
ItiE [$14],{:(q'(lao!)1 4 tEil 20n-4.f;:r