Telangana High Court
WP/17269/1999 of M/s Kesoram Sunderlal Fathepuria, Vs The Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Addittional on 31 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17269_of 1999 Between: M/s.Kesoram Sunderlal Fathepuria, Reptd., by
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OFDECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.17269_of 1999
Between:M/s.Kesoram Sunderlal Fathepuria,Reptd., by its Partner SatyanarayanaFathepuria Sunderlal, 51 yrs, Ranigunj,Secunderabad.
… Petitioner
AndThe Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad and six others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners: None
Counsel for respondents: None
This Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“to issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the common orders passed inE.A.Nos.7 to 12, dated 21-7-1999 as illegal, arbitrary,contrary to law, consequently direct the 1[st] respondent toallow the petitioners to lead evidence in E.P.Nos.1 to 6 of1999, with regard to gainful employment of therespondent-workmen”.
On 30-12-2008 when this case was called, no oneappeared for the petitioner. Even today, the learnedcounsel for the petitioner is not present both in theforenoon and again in the afternoon. It is, therefore,reasonable to presume that the petitioner is notinterested in prosecuting the case.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default.
---------------------------------------
- REDDY, J
C.V.NAGARJUNA
Date:31-12-2008MNR
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…