Telangana High Court
WP/46613/2022 of Arra Praneeth Kumar Goud Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others on 30 December 2022
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL 1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO:46613 OF 2022
Between:
Arra Praneeth Kumar Goud, S/o. Arra Pochgoud, Aged 27 years,Occ: Un-employee, R/o. Flat No. 30'1, SLCK Residency, Road No.5,Beeramguda, Sangareddy Dist..
...PETITIONERAND
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, HomeDepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Chairmen, Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, DGPComplex, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.Complex, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.
3. The Chief Superintendent and Superintendent of Police, Sangareddy Districtat sangaredd, ...RESP'NDENTSat sangaredd, ...RESP'NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly are in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus declare the Action of the 3rd Respondent in not acted uponPetitioners application dt.2311212022 for seeking Re-measurement of His LongJump Test in the presence of committee headed by the Chief Superintendent i.e.,3 Respondent before conclusion of the day's PET [(Physical ]Efficiency Test) forthe Recruitment of the Sub-lnspector of Police SCT Sl Civil and for Equivalentwith Registration No, 1250584 in respect of Notification daled 2510412022,28104/2022 and 2010512022 issued by the 2nd Respondent without recheckingthrough surveillance Cameras before disqualifying the Petitioner in Long JumpEven as illegal, arbitrary violative of principal of natural [justice ]and also violationof Att. 14, 15 (3), 16 and 42 of Constrtutional of lndia and consequently set aside d isq ua lification report only to the extent of Long-Jump Even in PhysicalEfficiency Test Report dated. 1 31 1212022lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section ['151 ]CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to consider my representation/Applicationdated. 2311212022 for Re-measurement of the Petitioner's Long Jump Even inthe presence of committee headed by the Chief Superrntendent i.e., 3Respondent before conclusion of the day's PET (Physical Efficiency Test) for theRecruitment of the Sub-lnspector of Police SCT Sl Civil and /or Equivalent withRegistration No. 1 250584in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to consider my representation/Applicationdated. 2311212022 for Re-measurement of the Petitioner's Long Jump Even inthe presence of committee headed by the Chief Superrntendent i.e., 3Respondent before conclusion of the day's PET (Physical Efficiency Test) for theRecruitment of the Sub-lnspector of Police SCT Sl Civil and /or Equivalent withRegistration No. 1 250584
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P. SRIHARINATHCounsel for the Respondents: SRl. CHANDRAIAH, GP FOR SERVICES IThe Court made the following: ORDER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.46613 of 2022
This writ petition is fi1ed under Article 226 of constitutionof India seeking the following relief:of India seeking the following relief:
'....Io issue a Writ, Order of rlireclion more particularly are innoture of wit of Manduttus declare the Action ql tlte 3,,1Respondent in not a.led upon my appttcation clt.23 12-2022 fotseeking Re-measurement of mA Long .lutp Test in the preserlceof committee headed bg the Chief Superintendent i.e.3Respondent before cpnclusiorl of the dag's PET(PhgsicalEffrciencg Test) fol the Recruitntcnt of the Sub-lnspector of PohceSCT SI Civil and, /or Equiuolent u'ith Regi.strdtion No.125O584 inrespect of Notirtcafion dated 25.04.2O22, 28.O4.2022 and2O-O5.5O22 issued Dy the 2"d respondent uithotlt recheckittgthrough surueillance Cqmeras before disqualtfging the I'etitionerin lang Jump Euen as illegal, drbitary uiolatiue of pnncipal ofnntural [justice ]and dlso uiolation of Art.14, 15 (3), 16 and 42 ofConstitutiondl of India anrd. conseq,tentlA set asidedisqualification report onlg to tlte extent of Long-Jump Euen inPhysical Test Report dabd 13.12.2022 amd pass...'
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thepetitioner has not qualified in the Long Jump Test conducted bythe respondents. He made arr application to the 3.d respondentofi 23.12.2022 for conducting re-measurement of Long-Jump,but still the respondents have not considered the applicationand aggrieved by which the present petition is filed seeking theintervention of this CourL.
3. On the other hand, Mr.Chandraiah, learned SpecialGovernment Pleader for Services-I submits that therepresentation made by the petitioner on 23.12.2022 is under consideration and without waiting for the outcome of therepresentation, the petitioner rushed to this Court in hurriedmanner and therefore prays this Court to dismiss the writpetition.4. In vieu' of the submissions made by both the counsels,this Court is inclined to direct the 3.d respondent to considerthe re presentation of the petitioner dated 23.12.2022 inpetition.4. In vieu' of the submissions made by both the counsels,this Court is inclined to direct the 3.d respondent to considerthe re presentation of the petitioner dated 23.12.2022 inaccordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably,within one (0 l) week from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.within one (0 l) week from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.
To,
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.6. lnterlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writpetition, shall also stand disposed of.
SD/- C. PRAVEEN KUMARASSISTANT REGISTRARqSECTION OFFICER
,,/TRUE COPY//
1. The Principal Secretary, Home [Department, ]Secretariat, State [of ][Telangana,]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
Hyderabad.2. The Chairmen, Telangana State [Level ]Police Recruitment Board, [DGP]Comolex. Lakadikaoool. Hvderabad.Comolex. Lakadikaoool. Hvderabad.3. The Chiei Superintendent ind Superintendent of [Police, ]Sangareddy [District]at Sangareddy.at Sangareddy.4. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana,atHyderabadlOUTlHyderabadlOUTl5. One CC to SRl. P. SRIHARINATH, Advocate [OPUC]6. Two CD copiesB tVILS6. Two CD copiesB tVILS
$,.Jr
ta
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212022
ORDER
WP.No.46613 of 2022
'r:1i,'rf'a: S }7,iff
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS