Telangana High Court
WP/29070/2019 of Doosa Chakrapani Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2019
T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.29070 OF 2019 ORDER: Being aggrieved by the order of rejection of the appeal filed by the 3rd respondent in Rc. No.1220/2019/M4 dated 30.11.2019 against the issue of Form “E” dated 05.07.2019 for offence in file No.07/C/OR//FROCPL/2019-20 dated
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Being aggrieved by the order of rejection of the appeal filed by the 3[rd] respondent in Rc. No.1220/2019/M4 dated 30.11.2019 against the issue of Form “E” dated 05.07.2019 for offence in file No.07/C/OR//FROCPL/2019-20 dated 24.06.2019 of the 4[th]respondent, the present writ petition is filed on the ground that the order of the 3[rd] respondent is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice.
Heard Sri G. Raman Goud, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Forests.
A perusal of the order dated 30.11.2019, passed by the 3[rd]respondent shows that the said order came to be passed upon calling for the remarks from the 4[th] respondent against whose proceeding the said appeal has been filed. The impugned order however does not indicate as to whether an opportunity of hearing has been granted to the petitioner before the said order came to be passed. Further, the order also does not reflect that various grounds taken by the petitioner having been considered.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has filed the appeal seeking for reduction of the compounding fee levied by the 4[th] respondent. While the learned Government Pleader submits that the compounding fee levied by the authority is the minimum, which is prescribed under the Rules and there cannot be any reduction.
Having regard to the fact that since the impugned order is passed without affording an opportunity of hearing and without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, the order dated 30.11.2019 of the 3[rd]respondent herein is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the said authority to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner under Rule 10(1) of the Telangana Forest Offences (Compounding and Prosecution) Rules, 1969, afresh within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity to the petitioner.
Subject to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J Date: 31.12.2019. MRKR