Telangana High Court
WP/26415/2003 of Mekala Venkata Subbaiah Vs The Guntur Dist. Co-op Central Bank on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 26415 of 2003 Between: Mekala Venkata Subbaiah s/o chinna Mallaiah r/o Vinukonda, Guntur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 26415 of 2003
Between:
Mekala Venkata Subbaiah s/o chinna Mallaiahr/o Vinukonda, Guntur District
AND
..... PETITIONER
1. The Guntur Dist. Co-op Central Bank Guntur, rep by its Branch Manager, Vinukonda, rep by its Branch Manager, Vinukonda, Guntur District
2. The Senior Inspector/Sale/Officer/Arbitrator G.D.C.C.Bank Ltd., Narsaraopet, Guntur District
3. The A.P.Co-operative Tribunal, Vijayawada
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writCertiorari calling for the records pertaining to the M.P.NO.929/2003 inO.A.NO.55/2002 dt.06-11-2003 on the file of the A.P. Co-operative Tribunal,Vijayawada and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and capricious and violative ofprinciples of natural justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA
Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2: Mr Poosani VenkateswarluCounsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner filed letter dated 29[th ]December, 2004to the effect that in the subject matter, the respondent bank and the petitioner havesettled the matter outside the court on one time settlement. Therefore, the petitionerinstructed the learned counsel to withdraw the Writ Petition to expedite thesettlement process of one time settlement scheme.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
____________
30-12-2004
kvrm
To
1. The Guntur Dist. Co-op Central Bank Guntur, rep by itsm Branch Manager, Vinukonda, Guntur District
2. The Senior Inspector/Sale/Officer/Arbitrator G.D.C.C.Banl Ltd., Narsaraopet, Guntur District
3. The A.P.Co-operative Tribunal, Vijayawada
4. 2 CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
5. 2 CD copies.