Telangana High Court

WP/15434/2000 of Smt. Kadali Jhansilakshmi, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999, 13055 AND 15434 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION No.12844 of 1999 Between: East

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU

WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,13055 AND 15434 OF 2000

WRIT PETITION No.12844 of 1999

Between:

East Godavari District Setti Balija Sangham, Kakinada by Sri KadaliSuryanarayana, S/o K.Venkanna, Secretary R/o Srinagar, Kakinada

AND

1 Govt. of A.P. rep. by Prl. Secretary

Social Welfare Dept., Secretariat,

Hyderabad

2 Govt. of A.P. rep. by District Collector East Godavari Dist., Kakinada East Godavari Dist., Kakinada

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the natureof Certiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 Backward ClassesWelfare (A) Dept., dt: 19-6-99 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitraryand voilative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently directthe 2nd respondent not to take any steps in furtherance of its proceedingsL.Dis.C6/M/533/99 dt: 1-5-99 and to set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO

Guttula Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Suryanarayana,R/o.K.Jagannathapuram Inavilli Mandal, E.G.District

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, E.G.District, Kakinada E.G.District, Kakinada

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order, direction preferably a writ in the Nature ofCertiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 B.C.W. (A) Dept. dt.19.6.99and quash the same being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of theConstitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not to implementthe said G.O. and to set aside the same and pass such other order or ordersas this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO

Smt. Kadali Jhansilakshmi, W/o Dr.K.Satyanarayana,Settibalija Mahilamandali, Tatipaka,Razole Mandal, East Godavari District.

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The District Collector, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Kakinada, East Godavari District.

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order, direction, preferably a writ in the Nature ofCertiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 B.C..W(A). Department dt19-06-1997 and quash the same being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not toimplement the said G.O. and to set aside the same and pass such other orderor orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU

The Court made the following :

WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,

13055 AND 15434 OF 2000

C O M M O NO R D E R

No representation for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petitions aredismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

22[nd] FEBRUARY, 2008PGS

------------------------------------JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU

To1.2CCs to2.2CD copies

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEC.Y.SOMAYAJULU

WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,13055 AND 15434 OF 2000

22[nd] FEBRUARY, 2008

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead