Telangana High Court
WP/15434/2000 of Smt. Kadali Jhansilakshmi, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999, 13055 AND 15434 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION No.12844 of 1999 Between: East
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,13055 AND 15434 OF 2000
WRIT PETITION No.12844 of 1999
Between:
East Godavari District Setti Balija Sangham, Kakinada by Sri KadaliSuryanarayana, S/o K.Venkanna, Secretary R/o Srinagar, Kakinada
AND
1 Govt. of A.P. rep. by Prl. Secretary
Social Welfare Dept., Secretariat,
Hyderabad
2 Govt. of A.P. rep. by District Collector East Godavari Dist., Kakinada East Godavari Dist., Kakinada
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the natureof Certiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 Backward ClassesWelfare (A) Dept., dt: 19-6-99 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitraryand voilative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently directthe 2nd respondent not to take any steps in furtherance of its proceedingsL.Dis.C6/M/533/99 dt: 1-5-99 and to set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO
Guttula Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Suryanarayana,R/o.K.Jagannathapuram Inavilli Mandal, E.G.District
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, E.G.District, Kakinada E.G.District, Kakinada
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order, direction preferably a writ in the Nature ofCertiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 B.C.W. (A) Dept. dt.19.6.99and quash the same being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of theConstitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not to implementthe said G.O. and to set aside the same and pass such other order or ordersas this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO
Smt. Kadali Jhansilakshmi, W/o Dr.K.Satyanarayana,Settibalija Mahilamandali, Tatipaka,Razole Mandal, East Godavari District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The District Collector, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Kakinada, East Godavari District.
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any appropriate writ, order, direction, preferably a writ in the Nature ofCertiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.16 B.C..W(A). Department dt19-06-1997 and quash the same being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not toimplement the said G.O. and to set aside the same and pass such other orderor orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU
The Court made the following :
WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,
13055 AND 15434 OF 2000
C O M M O NO R D E R
Conclusion
No representation for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petitions aredismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
22[nd] FEBRUARY, 2008PGS
------------------------------------JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
To1.2CCs to2.2CD copies
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEC.Y.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION NOs.12844 of 1999,13055 AND 15434 OF 2000
22[nd] FEBRUARY, 2008