Telangana High Court
CRLP/9058/2021 of Sureka Devi Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2021
SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9058 OF 2021 ORDER:- This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail to the petitioner/sole accused in connection with COR No. 259 of 2021 on the file of Prohibition & Excise
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMANCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9058 OF 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail to the petitioner/sole accused in connection with COR No. 259 of 2021 on the file of Prohibition & Excise Station, Bhadrachalam, wherein the petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.10.2021 at about 04:30 p.m., on credible information, the Prohibition & Excise Inspector, AC Enforcement, Khammam, along with staff, conducted a route-watch at Bhadrachalam Bus Station and found the petitioner in possession of contraband weighing 25 kg. kept in the polythene cover. The said contraband was seized and the petitioner was sent to judicial custody.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a commonality in the witnesses shown in the panchanama in the present case as well as in other two cases which were registered, one in the afternoon and the other on the next day morning. In all these three cases, even the quantity of contraband is shown as 25 kg. It is also his contention that the case is registered for statistical purpose.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposed the request of the petitioner for grant of bail, contending that the contraband seized from the possession of the petitioner is ‘commercial quantity’ and therefore, no sympathy can be extended.
5. The fact is that the petitioner is a resident of Bihar State and she was found in possession of contraband which is ‘commercial quantity’. The arrest was effected on 26.10.2021. In the circumstances, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of her non-availability for conducting further investigation as well as to proceed with the trial. Therefore, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. In the result, the petition is dismissed.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________ M. LAXMAN, J
Date :31.12.2021 tsr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9058 OF 2021
DATE: 31-12-2021