Telangana High Court
WP/40135/2014 of Daruvuri Rajeswari, Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2014
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.40135 of 2014 BETWEEN Daruvuri
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEENPRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
BETWEEN
WRIT PETITION No.40135 of 2014
Daruvuri Rajeswari and another.
AND
... PETITIONERS
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to TransportDepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT (TG)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioners state that though they are prepared to pay tax and offered demand drafts, respondent No.3, Regional Transport Officer, is not accepting the demand drafts nor is accepting the application of thepetitioners offering to pay quarterly tax relating vehicles bearing Nos.AP 28TB 8179 and AP 28 TE 3355.
2. Though the petitioners have filed xerox copies of the demand drafts,there is no application on record. In the absence of any application, therequest of the petitioners cannot be considered. Hence, petitioners aregranted liberty to make appropriate application before respondents 3 and 4by sending it by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due so as to enablerespondents 3 and 4 to pass appropriate orders on the said application.
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
December 30, 2014DSK
_____________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J