WP/23752/2004 of Vajudunnisa Begu, Vs The Inspector of Railway Protection Force, on 22 December 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIand THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU

WRIT PETITION NO : 23752 of 2004

Between:Vajudunnisa Begu, W/o. Late Ameenuddin, Muslim,R/o. D.No. 1/105, Mallapur, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District.

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Inspector of Railway Protection Force, Secunderabad.2 The Sub- Inspector of Railway Protection Force, Secunderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of HabeasCorpus directing the respondents herein to produce the detenu by name AbdulSamad, S/o. Late Ameenuddin, aged 23 Years, R/o. 1-105, Mallapur, MalkajgiriMandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or ordersCounsel for the Petitioner: MR.GANDURI NAGESWARA RAOCounsel for the Respondents: MR.GOURI SHANKAR SANGHI , Standingcounsel The Court at the admission stage made the following :

Order: (Per Sri BN.J)

In this Habeas Corpus Petition, it is alleged that the detenu has been arrested on14.12.2004.

In the counter affidavit it is stated that the alleged detenu was not arrested atall. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenu wasreleased yesterday evening.

Since the petitioner says that the detenu is now not in custody, no furtherorders are necessary. However, if the detenu is aggrieved by his alleged arrest anddetention, he may seek appropriate remedies from the appropriate Court.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

__________________

To

1 The Inspector of Railway Protection Force, Secunderabad.

2 The Sub- Inspector of Railway Protection Force, Secunderabad.

3 2 CD copies.