Telangana High Court
WP/15142/1995 of Adapa Satyanarayana , Satyam Vs The Agent to Government on 27 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15142 of 1995 Between: Adapa Satyanarayana @ Satyam, S/o. Kistaiah, R/o. Sitanagaram
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 15142 of 1995
Between:
Adapa Satyanarayana @ Satyam, S/o. Kistaiah,R/o. Sitanagaram Village, Chintalapudi Mandal,West Godavari District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Agent to Government,
Khammam.
2 The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare Paloncha, Khammam District 3 Bonkuri Narayana, S/o. Veeravenkaiah, R/o. Sitanagaram Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District (R3 dismissed for default as per court order dt 12.7.2000)
4 Mandal Revenue Officer, Dammapet, Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may bepleased to call for the connected records from the respondents and issue anappropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamusdirecting the Respondents not to evict the petitioner from Ac. 3.20 guntas ofland in S.No. 59 situated at Gunnepalli Village, Dammapet Mandal, KhammamDist., and restore the same to the 3rd Respondent pending the appeal beforethe agent to the Government of Khammam filed against the order of the specialDeputy Collector (TW) Paloncha in case No. 1018/94/DPT dated 16/05/1995and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RANGA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents 1,2 & 4: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri K.Ranga Rao, learned counsel appearing forthe writ petitioner, that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No order as to costs.
______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
27.12.2004
DR
To
1 The Agent to Government,
Khammam.
2 The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare Paloncha, Khammam District 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Dammapet, Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District 4 2CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT)
5 2CD copies