Telangana High Court
WP/22376/1996 of A.P. Private Hospitals AND Nursing Homes Association, Vs State of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, on 27 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 22376 of 1996 Between: 1 A.P. Private
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 22376 of 1996
Between:
1 A.P. Private Hospitals & Nursing Homes Association, Rep. by its General Secretary Hyderabad.
2 Indian Medical Association, Rep. by General Secretary.
A.P. State Branch, Koti, Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
State of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the HighCourt may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any otherappropriate writ, direction or directions, declaring the imposition ofprofessional Tax at the rate mentioned in Serial No.20 (B) of the Ist Schedule of the Ordinance 21/96 dt. 1-8-96 published in A.P. GazattePt.IV-B No.30 dt. 1-8-96, as arbitrary, unreasonable andunconstitutional and to direct the respondent to act in accordancewith law and pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemfit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.SRINIVASCounsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAXESThe Court made the following :
O R D E R (Per MHSA,J)
In the instant case, petitioners have questioned certain provisions ofthe ordinance 21/96, whereby the first schedule has been amended.
2. It is not in dispute that the Ordinance has been replaced by an Actand, therefore, we dismiss the writ petition with liberty to thepetitioners, if so advised, to question the Act or the provisions thereof.
3. With liberty as aforestated, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed without going into the merits of the main controversy.
---------------------------
M.H.S.ANSARI, J
----------------------------
ELIPE DHARMA RAO,J
To
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, Commercial TaxesDepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. G.P. for Commercial Tax, A.P. High Court Building, Hyderabad (O.U.T.)
3. Two C.D. copies.