Telangana High Court
WP/22107/2008 of M.S.Palanivel, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 26 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22107 of 2008 Between: M.S.Palanivel, Proprietor, M/s M.S.P. Granites, TEKKALI, Srikakulam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION No.22107 of 2008
Between:
M.S.Palanivel, Proprietor,
M/s M.S.P. Granites, TEKKALI, Srikakulam District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Srikakulam District, SRIKAKULAM. Srikakulam District, SRIKAKULAM.
2 Chief Engineer, North Coast, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3 Superintending Engineer (I & CAD),
B.R.R. Vamsadhara Project Circle,
SRIKAKULAM, Srikakulam District.
4 Executive Engineer, I.D., B.R.R. Vamsadhara Project, M.C. Division, TEKKALI, Srikakulam district.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtmay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring theproceedings of the 3[rd] respondent in Letter No.SSE/SKLM/DB/AT02/LMC/1288 (a) M dated 2-10-2008 and the consequential letter No.503M/EE/MCD/TKI/AB/EXB dated 2-10-2008 of the 4th respondent asillegal and void and consequently permit the petitioner to continue theconstruction of S.L.Pipe culvert KM.64.445 on Left Main Canal of B.R.RVamsadhara Project Main Canal.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMMAREA DEV.
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULUWRIT PETITION No.22107 OF 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated23.12.2008 to the Registry stating that he has instructions from thepetitioner to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
26[th] December, 2008IBL
__________________
JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU