Telangana High Court
WP/17431/2008 of Mohammed Saleemuddin , Saleem Uddin Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.17431 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in infringing and violating the rights of
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17431 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.
This Writ Petition was filed challenging the action of respondentNos.3 and 4 in infringing and violating the rights of the petitioner and hisfamily members and for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1and 2 to register appropriate criminal cases against respondent Nos.3 to6.
Though respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not filed any counteraffidavit, learned Government Pleader, on the basis of the writteninstructions from respondent No.3, submits that based on the complaintof respondent No.5 a case in Crime No.222 of 2008 was registeredagainst the petitioner on 10.07.2008 and investigation was taken up. Since a prima facie case was made out against the petitioner,appropriate charge sheet was filed before the Court of learned ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and the same was taken on file inC.C.No.899 of 2010. The petitioner is facing trial in the said case. Except registering the above complaint, the Police never interfered withthe life of the petitioner.
In view of the above statement made by respondent No.3 in thewritten instructions given to the learned Government Pleader, the WritPetition is devoid of any merits, and the same is, accordingly,dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________________
(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
30.12.2014
vs