Telangana High Court
WP/17664/1999 of K. Hari Gopala Reddy, Vs The Chairman, on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.17664 of 1999 Between: K.Hari Gopala Reddy and another. …
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OFDECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
WRIT PETITION No.17664 of 1999
Between:
K.Hari Gopala Reddy and another.
…
Petitioners
AndThe Chairman, Sri Venkateswara GrameenaBank, Chittoor, Chittoor District.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners:Sri K.Narsi Reddy for SriP.Gangarami Reddy.
Counsel for the respondents:None.
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
-ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actionof the respondent in seeking to withhold the promotionof the petitioners to Scale-II category on the basis ofthe departmental enquiry pending against thepetitioners as illegal and arbitrary and consequentlydirect the respondent to promote the petitioners toscale-II category without taking into consideration thependency of departmental enquiry against thepetitioners”.
At the hearing, Sri K.Narsi Reddy, counselrepresenting Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counselfor the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the WritPetition does not survive for consideration and that theWrit Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissedas infructuous.
As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition,WPMP No.22005 of 1999 is also dismissed asinfructuous.
------------------------------------
C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY,J
Date: 24-12-2008MNR