Telangana High Court
CRLA/625/2000 of Vemula Ganesh, Vs The State of A.P., on 27 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.625 of 2000 (Criminal Appeal under Sec. 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of the Court of the IV
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX: PRESENT :THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.625 of 2000
(Criminal Appeal under Sec. 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of theCourt of the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad made inSC.No. 273/1998 dt. 24-03-2000)
Between:
1. Vemula Ganesh, S/o. Rambajan ( A-1)
2. K.Venkatesh, S/o. Jangaiah (A-2).
3. G.Seenu, S/o. G.Lingaiah (A-3)
Appellants
AND
The State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.
Respondent
The Appeal coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and Groundsfiled herein and the order of the High Court dated. 12-06-2000 made in Crl.M.P.No.2911/2000 and upon hearing the arguments the Public Prosecutor for theRespondent and of Sri Kunareddy Anji Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants (Notpresent).
The Court made the following ORDER:
“ This appeal came up for hearing on 19-10-2006. There was norepresentation on behalf of the appellants and therefore it was directed to belisted “Next Week”. On 26-10-2006 when the appeal came up for hearing therewas no representation and therefore, it was directed to be listed “Next Week”.Even on this day also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The appellants have been on bail pending disposal of the Crl.A. asper orders in Crl.M.P.No. 2911 of 2000. The conduct of the appellants in notproceeding with the appeal does not deserve them to be continued on bailpending disposal of the appeal. Hence, the bail granted to them as per ordersin Crl.M.P.No. 2911 of 2000 is cancelled and the trial Court is directed to issueN.B.W. against them and on execution of the same, the appellant-accusedshall be committed to prison pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. Post after two weeks.
K.LAKSHMINARAYANA
REGISTRAR
SD/-
ASSISTANT
// TRUE COPY //for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Spl. Judge for trial of cases under IV Additional Metropolitan SessionsJudge, Hyderabad. (By Spl. Messenger)Judge, Hyderabad. (By Spl. Messenger)
2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
3. One CC to Sri Kunareddy Anji Reddy, Advocate(OPUC)
4. One spare copy.
5. The XXI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
6. The Superintendent, Chenchalguda Jail, Hyderabad.
SAH
HIGH COURT
BSSRJ
DATED: 08-11-2006
NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS
DIRECTION
DRAFTED BY: SAHAPPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 09-11-2006
HIGH COURT
BSSRJ
NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRL.A.NO. 625 OF 2000