Telangana High Court

CRLA/625/2000 of Vemula Ganesh, Vs The State of A.P., on 27 December 2006

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.625 of 2000 (Criminal Appeal under Sec. 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of the Court of the IV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX: PRESENT :THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B.SESHASAYANA REDDY

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.625 of 2000

(Criminal Appeal under Sec. 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of theCourt of the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad made inSC.No. 273/1998 dt. 24-03-2000)

Between:

1. Vemula Ganesh, S/o. Rambajan ( A-1)

2. K.Venkatesh, S/o. Jangaiah (A-2).

3. G.Seenu, S/o. G.Lingaiah (A-3)

Appellants

AND

The State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.

Respondent

The Appeal coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and Groundsfiled herein and the order of the High Court dated. 12-06-2000 made in Crl.M.P.No.2911/2000 and upon hearing the arguments the Public Prosecutor for theRespondent and of Sri Kunareddy Anji Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants (Notpresent).

The Court made the following ORDER:

“ This appeal came up for hearing on 19-10-2006. There was norepresentation on behalf of the appellants and therefore it was directed to belisted “Next Week”. On 26-10-2006 when the appeal came up for hearing therewas no representation and therefore, it was directed to be listed “Next Week”.Even on this day also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The appellants have been on bail pending disposal of the Crl.A. asper orders in Crl.M.P.No. 2911 of 2000. The conduct of the appellants in notproceeding with the appeal does not deserve them to be continued on bailpending disposal of the appeal. Hence, the bail granted to them as per ordersin Crl.M.P.No. 2911 of 2000 is cancelled and the trial Court is directed to issueN.B.W. against them and on execution of the same, the appellant-accusedshall be committed to prison pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. Post after two weeks.

K.LAKSHMINARAYANA

REGISTRAR

SD/-

ASSISTANT

// TRUE COPY //for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1. The Spl. Judge for trial of cases under IV Additional Metropolitan SessionsJudge, Hyderabad. (By Spl. Messenger)Judge, Hyderabad. (By Spl. Messenger)

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

3. One CC to Sri Kunareddy Anji Reddy, Advocate(OPUC)

4. One spare copy.

5. The XXI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

6. The Superintendent, Chenchalguda Jail, Hyderabad.

SAH

HIGH COURT

BSSRJ

DATED: 08-11-2006

NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS

DIRECTION

DRAFTED BY: SAHAPPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 09-11-2006

HIGH COURT

BSSRJ

NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CRL.A.NO. 625 OF 2000

DIRECTION

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead