WP/42611/2015 of Gandela Venkata Narasamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2015

ORDER:

It is not in dispute that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarelycovered by the common judgment of this Court in W.P.No.41703 of 2015 andbatch, dated 23-12-2015.

Hence, this writ petition is also disposed of with similar directions,which reads as under:- “Since the 3[rd] respondent has jurisdiction to issueimpugned notice, I do not see any reason to entertain the writpetition. It is also clear that until appropriate orders are passedby the 3[rd] respondent in accordance with the A.P. AssignedLands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act and Rules, the petitionercannot be dispossessed.

Hence, the petitioner is permitted to file her explanationto the impugned show cause notice within two weeks from today and on receipt of such explanation, the 3[rd] respondentshall consider the same and issue appropriate orders, asdirected above. Till then, the petitioner shall not bedispossessed or otherwise interfered with the land which is thesubject matter of the impugned notice.”

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. No costs.

Date: 31-12-2015Prv

_______________________

VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

W.P.No.42611 of 2015

Prv