Telangana High Court
WP/452/1996 of Smt.Vyragade Bagu Bai Vs District Collector on 27 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 452 of 1996 Between: 1 Smt. Vyragade Bagu Bai W/o.Pochanna, Janakapur Village,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 452 of 1996
Between:
1 Smt. Vyragade Bagu Bai W/o.Pochanna,
Janakapur Village, Asifabad Mandal,
Adilabad District.
2 Smt. Vyragade Bajju Bai W/o.Sankar,
Janakapur Village, Asifabad Mandal, Adilabad District. Adilabad District.
AND
..... PETITIONERS
1 District Collector, Adilabad.
2 The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District.
3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Asifabad, Adilabad District. Asifabad, Adilabad District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue any Writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondents in trying to take the possession of the land bearingSurvey Nos.217/A and 240, admeasuring Ac.8.30 cents and Ac.4.18 cents situatedat Janakapur Village, Asifabad Mandal, Adilabad district and further direct therespondents not to evict the petitioners without following the procedure.
Counsel for Petitioners: MR. V.MANOHAR RAO
Counsel for Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri V.Manohar Rao, learned Counsel for petitioners, submits that the writ petitionhas become infructuous. Placing the said submission on record, the writ petition isdismissed as infructuous.
No costs.
Dated: 27[th] December, 2004.
Ak
____________________
R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
// TRUE COPY //
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. The District Collector, Adilabad District.
2. The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Asifabad Mandal, Adilabad District.
4. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T).
5. Two CD copies.