Telangana High Court
WP(PIL)/316/2020 of Kare Madhu, And Another Vs Sate of Telangana, And 6 Others on 31 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH GHAUHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Between: 1. Kare [\,4adhu, Son of Kare
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH GHAUHANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION [(PlL) ]NO: 316 OF 2020
Between:
1. Kare [\,4adhu, Son of Kare Ramachandraiah, aged 33 years, Occupation.Agriculture, R/o H.No.2-53, tVamidipalle village, Kothur mandal, I\/ahabubnagardistrict now Nandigama mandal, Rangareddy district.Agriculture, R/o H.No.2-53, tVamidipalle village, Kothur mandal, I\/ahabubnagardistrict now Nandigama mandal, Rangareddy district.
2. Udutha Prabhu, Son of Udutha Narayana, aged 31 years, Occupation.Agriculture, Rio H.No.1-2813, Mamidipalle village, Kothur mandal,[\/ahabubnagar district now Nandigama Mandal, Rangareddy district.Agriculture, Rio H.No.1-2813, Mamidipalle village, Kothur mandal,[\/ahabubnagar district now Nandigama Mandal, Rangareddy district.
...PETITIONERS
AND
ISate of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department,Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.
2The District Collector, Rangareddy district, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.
JThe Tahsildar, Nandigama mandal, Rangareddy district.
4The Panchayat Secretary, I\/amidipalle village, Nandigama mandal, Rangareddydistrict.district.
EThe Gram Panchayat, Mamidipalle village, Nandigama mandal, Rangareddydistrict, Represented by its Sarpanch.district, Represented by its Sarpanch.
6The Executive Engineer, I & B Sub-Division, Shadnagar, [Rangareddy ][district.]
Page 1 of 3
7The Assistant Sub-Divisional Engineer, | & B Sub-Division, [Nandigama ][mandal,]Nandigama, Rangareddy district.Nandigama, Rangareddy district.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High Court may be ][pleased]to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, [particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature of ][writ ][of]N/andamus declaring the action of the [Respondents ][in ][erecting ][a ][dumping yard ][and]smashana vaatika (crematorium) in the [land forming part ][of ][FTL ][of ][Kundeti ][Kunta]cheruvu in survey number- [1. ]of Mamidipalle [village, Nandigama mandal, ][Rangareddy]district as illegal, arbitrary, violative [of ][law, ][Article- ][14 ][and ][21 ][of the ][constitution of]lndia and issue a consequential direction [directing ][the ][Respondents ][to ][restore ][the]entire exlent of Ac.25.1 5 [guntas ]in [survey ][number-1 ][of ][[/amidipalle ][village,]Nandigama mandal, Rangareddy [district ][as ][pond ][and ][maintain ][the ][same ][in ][the]interest of [justice.]
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct ][the]Respondents not to utilize any [part ][of the ][FTL extent ][(Acs.25.15 ][Gts) ][of ][Kondeti]Kunta cheruvu in survey No.1 of [Mamidipalle ][village, ][Nandigama ][mandal,]Rangareddy district as dumping [yard ][or ][buriat ground (smashana vaatika)]
Counsel for the [Petitioners:SRl ][JOINT PRABHAKAR ADVOCATE ][FOR]SRI. N M KRISHNATAH
Counsel forthe [Respondent ][Nos. ][1 ][& 4: ][GP FOR PANCHAYAT ][RAJ & ][RURAL]DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the [Respondent ][Nos. ][2 ][& ][3: GP FOR REVENUE]
Counsel for the [Respondent No' ][5: ][SRI' G' ][DAMODER REDDY' SC FOR GRAM]PANCHAYAT
Counsel forthe [Respondent ][Nos. ][6 & ][7: ][GP FOR ROADS ][& ][BUILDINGS]
The Court made [the ][following:]
Page 2 of 3
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble tbe Chi.fJustice Sri Raghvenilra stngh chauhar)
Mr. J. Prabhakar, proxy counsei for Mr. N. M. Krishnaiah, thelearned counsel for the petitioners, wishes to withdraw this Writ Petitionwith liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
Conclusion
Therefore, the Writ Petition (PIL) is, hereby, dismissed aswithdrawn. The liberty, so prayed, is hereby [granted. ]There shall be noorder as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
To '1. One CC to Sri. N.M. Krishnaiah, Advocate (OPUC)2. One CC to Sri. G. Damoder Reddy, SC for Gram panchayat (OPUC)3. Two ccs to the GP for Panchayaf nal & Rurar Developm6nt,'High cburt for theState of Telangana. (OUT)4. Two ccs to the GP for Revenue, High court for the state of reranoana. (oUT)5. Two ccs to the GP for Roads & Buildings, High court for the state"of reiangaha.(our)6. Two CD Copies.PN/.I--\
HIGH COURTDATED:3111212020
.ti_1HEsTAk06 JAil 2021q c)ORDER*WP(PIL).No.316 ot 2020r9
Dismissing the WPAs withdrawnWithout costs.
x'
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…