Telangana High Court
WP/40245/2012 of Ali Naser Abndrihan, Vs The Osmania University, Rep. by its Vice Chancellor on 28 December 2012
L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40245 OF 2012 ORDER: The petitioner joined the I Year of M.B.A Course in the 3rd respondent-institution for the academic year 2010-11. He has one backlog in the first semester, four backlogs in the second semester, and two backlogs in the third semester.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40245 OF 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner joined the I Year of M.B.A Course in the 3[rd] respondent-institution for the academic year 2010-11. He has onebacklog in the first semester, four backlogs in the second semester,and two backlogs in the third semester. Therefore, he was notdeclared pass.
On 06-12-2012, the University issued a time-table for theexaminations of first, second and third semesters of M.B.A Course tobe conducted from 24-12-2012 onwards. The petitioner states thatthough he is entitled to appear therein, the respondents 1 and 2 are notaccording permission to take the examinations. He seeks appropriatedirections in this regard.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedStanding Counsel for the University.
The petitioner did not clear backlogs during the course of hisstudy. It is brought to the notice of this Court that he appeared in thetest, conducted in the month of June, but did not clear the backlogs. The examinations, which are being conducted from 24-12-2012 are not general in nature. It is specifically for the regularbatch of third semester of M.B.A., and, for clearance of backlogs andimprovement of first and second semesters of 2011 and 2012 batch. When the examinations are being conducted for a limited purpose, thepetitioner, who does not suit into those specifications, cannot insist onbeing accorded permission. He has to wait till the generalexaminations are conducted.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. The miscellaneouspetition filed in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Dt.28-12-2012.
______________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
KO