Telangana High Court

TRCMP/591/2018 of Vijaya sal Poultries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Uppalapati Radhika on 30 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR or r"or#lBhrE oF TELANGANA THURSDAY, THE THIRTIE' rwo iH oi, ii iG hi5 flf,l NofyD Ec E A /B E R TH E H o N o U RA B L E S R I,,,,Tff,U T.,,. N KAT E S H WA RA R E D D Y Vrjaya sai pourtries pvt Ltd. Rep by its A ,4anaging Director. Vemurapari

IN THE HIGH COURT FORor r"or#lBhrE [oF ][TELANGANA]

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIE'rwo iH oi, ii iG hi5 flf,l NofyD Ec E A/B E R

TH E H o N o U RA B L E S R I,,,,Tff,U T.,,. N KAT E S H WA RA R E D D Y

TR.C. M.P. NO: 591 0F 2018

Between:

Vrjaya sai pourtries pvt Ltd. Rep by its A,4anaging Director. Vemurapari Naveen[-3i:,[9;,18^,'ff,x?[?,lrurfl"",lk..,tf;i,i:, rr",]n, or D NotiJr?Tr,!"r."ti.t ...PET|TIoNER/PETIT|oNER

AND

l District' D. Uppalapati No. 6- 1 state 3 1, Cha Radhika of Andhra tasa w/o ni .gsii, piaobsrr Ratnasekhar, 26 years, house-wife, xi.iii [- ]i, [- ]iriril ['-rv:'v' ]j"]tlnr [I ][! ]r" ru ru Manda Resident r, Krish ofna

....praintiff/ 1.t Respondent

2. Anqirekula Raieswari, Wo Nagarjuna, Aged about 58 years, years, D.No.

58 years, years, D.No.^ s lgnqOgrt!_[umar, 1 -2-21 0 I 87 139, Krish S/o nanaga r Joleph, c"otdny,-S ng6qib6ri5d u,i,ipJiltrt" y:ears, of business, Teta ngana. resident ( D2 )of D.No.54-19-21tSF, Reoency aparthent,".t.R.ttrgir, LiC C"i".v, V,rrvtrr".io",'iin'{r,'n,District. (D3)54-19-21tSF, Reoency aparthent,".t.R.ttrgir, LiC C"i".v, V,rrvtrr".io",'iin'{r,'n,District. (D3)4 lpJ:[y]lNgoarjuna, S/o Kristaiah, aged 62 years, business, D.No.lpJ:[y]lNgoarjuna, S/o Kristaiah, aged 62 years, business, D.No._ [1-2-270187139, ][Krishnanagar colony, ][S-urya ][pe( ]State of Telanoana. [(D4)]5 4lS,Igly]g Boopesh Chandra. S/o irlagarjuna, Ased anoui sz [-y"jii,' ]D. [(o.]1 -2-27 0 I 87 I 39, Krishnana ga r co lony, Su ryapet, S"tate of Tela ndana. ( D5 )5 4lS,Igly]g Boopesh Chandra. S/o irlagarjuna, Ased anoui sz [-y"jii,' ]D. [(o.]1 -2-27 0 I 87 I 39, Krishnana ga r co lony, Su ryapet, S"tate of Tela ndana. ( D5 )O f1Or19!r1.!1eala lvlahinder, S/o Naijarjun6, Aged about 36 yeais, D.r.,ro. [']1 -2 [- ]27 0 t 87 t 3s, K ri s h n a n a g a r co t o n y, S u p rya 1 -2 [- ]27 0 t 87 t 3s, K ri s h n a n a g a r co t o n y, S u p rya :: _r.,SF"ffi ["J ]f,,+r"1[? JBB* r * r,=

Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to transfer O.S.No.12 of 2017 on the file of the Courl of ll Additional District Judge, Nalgonda atSuryapet to any Court in Vijayawada, Krishna District or to any other Court in A.P.,Suryapet to any Court in Vijayawada, Krishna District or to any other Court in A.P., This petition coming on for hearing, upon [perusing ]the [petition ]and [the ][affidavit]filed in support thereof and upon [hearing ][the ][arguments ][of ][Sri ][N.Sriram ][Murthy,]Advocate for the [petitioner]

The Court made the following: [ORDER]

THE [HONOURABLE SRI ][JUSTICE ][A'VENXATESHWARA REDDY]oF2[018]SFtrRC.M.[P.N][o.5][91]

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard [the learned counsei ][for the petitioner']

Notice [of respondent Nos ][l ][and ][3 ][returned ][with ][endorsement]'addressee [left' and ]['1eft' ][respectively']

This Transfer [C ][M'P' ][is ][filed ][under ][Section ][24 ][of ][tLre ][Code ][of]Civil Procedure [(CPC) ][for transfer of ][O'S'No' 12 ][of ][2017 ][on the ][file]of the II [Additional ][District ][Judge' ][Nalgonda ][at ][Suryapet ][to ][any]Court in [Vijayawada, ][Krishna ][District ][or to ][any ][other ][Court ][in]Andhra Pradesh In view of the [changed circumstances ][with ][effect ][from]31.12.2018, [carving ][of ][separate ][High Courts from ][01'01'2019' ][in]my considered opinion, [this ][Court ][cannot ][entertain ][any ][such]applications under Section [24 ][CPC.]

with the above [observations, ][the ][Transfer]Accordingly, C.M.P. is disposed of with a liberty to [the ][petitioner ][to ][approach]the competent Court under Section 25 CPC.

As a sequel, the interlocutory applications, if any, sha1lstand closed.

SdIK.AMMAJIASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]/-',TRUE [COPY//]cJt)SECTION [OFFICER]

TolH?'tt11''l1ig,?:'Ji;j#f [,:"ANX3:iyi"S33y'0"']

3. Two [CD ][Copies]4. One [SPare ][CoPY]Ki.{

HIGH COURT

DATEDI30l1212021

ORDERTRCMP.No.591 ol 2018

DISPOSED OF.

i?.E.? \,/,II2 [7 ][Jtti ][?r??]'r/i,'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead