Telangana High Court
WP/27031/2021 of N. Prashanth Vs The Telangana State Nothern Power Distribution Company Ltd on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 32se ] ..,PETITIONER Between: AND 1 N. Prashanth, Sio Bhumaiah, aged about 30 years, Employee l.D No' SOOOzzSS, Artisan Grade - ll (U/S), 33111 KV Sub-station, Chandur, Bhodhan Division, R/o Koratpally Viilage, Dichpaly lt/andal, Nizamabad
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(SPecial Original [Jurisdiction)]FRIDAY, THE [THIRTIETH ][DAY OF DECEI\iIBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY TWO]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][E.V. ][VENUGOPAL]
WRIT PETITION [NO: 27031 ][OF ][2021]
Between:
N. Prashanth, Sio [Bhumaiah, ][aged ][about ][30 ][years, Employee ][l.D ][No']SOOOzzSS, Artisan Grade [- ][ll ][(U/S), ][33111 ][KV Sub-station, Chandur, ][Bhodhan]Division, R/o Koratpally [Viilage, Dichpaly lt/andal, ][Nizamabad ][Distrtct,]Telangana State
..,PETITIONER
AND
1The Telangana State Nothern Power Distribution Company Ltd, CorporateOffice, at Vidyuth Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN- 506002, rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging DirectorOffice, at Vidyuth Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN- 506002, rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging Director 2The Chief General Manager (HRD), TS NPDCL, Corporate Office, VidyuthBhava, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN - 506002,Bhava, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN - 506002, The Superintending Engineer (Operation), TS NPDCL, Nizamabad Circle,Nizamabad, Nizamabad District, Telangana StateNizamabad, Nizamabad District, Telangana State
4. The Divisional Engineer (Operation), Bhodhan Division, TS NPDCL, BhodhanCircle, Bhodhan, Nizamabad District, Telangana State.Circle, Bhodhan, Nizamabad District, Telangana State.
5. The Divisiolrai Engineer, (Enq.ll and Enquiry Officer) TS NPDCL, Warangal,Warangal DistrictWarangal District
...RESPONDENTS
circumstances Petition under stated Article 226 in the affidavit of the constitution fired therewith, of the lndia High'co"rrt praying that ,rv in the-oupleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction partLurarry one in thenature of writ of mandamus, decraring the action of the 3rd Respondent -sil.,ininitiating the departmentar Enquiry against the petitioner oy appointinl ir.," Respondent as the Enquiry officer ind the action of the- 5th ResponJent- ininitiating the departmental Enquiry, vide Memo. No. DEE (Enq.lt / f.fpOdll Wgi IF.No. 2509/21lD.No. 85/2-1 , dated 07-09-202i, during ir," cririi"rcase in cr' No. g5 0f 201g, on the same issue and on the same set of racts, benaen"y asarbitrary, illegar and viorative of Articres 14, 16 and 21 of the constitrtion orand lndia, contrary consequen,y to law set-aside declared.by [\,4emo. the No. Hon,ble Oee supieme (lnq.f l / court N'DCL in catena lwgf of [-l ]casesF.N..
..}:,?x,#ll l:fu :[il sr Crass il{],?.1*,,;; rrltigi;rr;," x1'.P,r il ":'i *",'sru i"J i ff ?,, :,:lIA NO: 10F 10F 20 21"iNi;:"; IA NO: 10F 10F 20 21
Petition under Secr
under SecrIii"rl'5iliflt [i:i",, ][ifJi:xixr?,yi,1,i ][ff,ffiHi:'ffix":,:s]No 5;1#:[i[tf ss or 20ie ;; [li!&,il,""",?^=7;"Iii?'i,xstll"-tl]1,";lmt,,ru]t'ff;f'^::9 [bY''lu ][Sth Respond']Nizamabad---pe-n;i;;;.ffi jml5UWY;:,T''I|X,'L:,..^,:UU,:*,:l Counsel for the petitioner: SRI CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA
Counsel for the Respondents: - _ _ _Respondents: - _ _ _
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.27O31 of 2O2l
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the [petitioner has ][addressed ][a ][letter]d.ttted 28.12.2022 to the [Registry ][requesting ][to ][post ][the ][matter]under the caption "for withdrawal".
2. In view of the letter submitted by the [learned counsel ][for]the petitioner, the writ pelition is dismissed as [withdrawn.]There shall be no order as to costs.
3. Interlocutory applications, if [any, ][pending ][in ][this ][writ]petition, shall also stand dismissed as withdrawn.SD/. N. CHANDRA [SEKHAR ][RAO]ASSTSTAN/tEglsrRAR//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICERe [1l ][)-' ]- -- 'O,,,. [on" ][CC ][to ][SRI ][CHANDRAIAH ][SUNKARA, ][AdVOCAIE ][TOPUC]]2. Two CD [CoPies]BNGJP
|\
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212022
ORDER
WP.No.27031 of 2021
S"t*,'5,:v^"oac\t-{,a"{
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS\\D