Telangana High Court
WP/24138/2000 of Union of India Vs M/s.Rama Rao on 29 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24138 of 2000 Between: 1 Union of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24138 of 2000
Between:
1 Union of India Rep.by its Secretary Ministry of Defence DHQ PO, New Delhi. Ministry of Defence DHQ PO, New Delhi.
2 The Engineer-in-chief, Army Headquarters Kashmir House New Delhi.
3 The Chief Engineer, Southern Command Pune, Maharastra. Pune, Maharastra.
AND
..... PETITIONERS
1 M.S.Rama Rao S/o.Late M.Appa Rao
C/o.Lt Col., MVC Rao, 1/18/42, MES Colony Venkatapuram Thirmalgiri, Secunderabad-15 Thirmalgiri, Secunderabad-15
2 Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Rep.by its Registrar Public Gardens, Hyderabad. Public Gardens, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the orders in OA.No.711/97 dated 9-6-1997 on the file of theCentral Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitraryand unsustainable in law and set aside the same.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.SANJEEV KUMAR, Additional StandingCounsel for Central Government.
Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following :
O R D E R: (PER GB.J)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is covered by thedecision of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in W.P.No.4450 of 2004, dated25.06.2004.
2) The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.4450 of 2004, dated 25.06.2004. No costs.
_________________
G.BIKSHAPATHY.J.,
_________________
P.S.NARAYANA.J.,
29.12.2004
tjs
To
1. Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Defence DHQ PO, New Delhi.(Along with a copy of judgment in W.P.No.4450 of 2004)(Along with a copy of judgment in W.P.No.4450 of 2004)
2. The Engineer-in-chief, Army Headquarters Kashmir House New Delhi. Kashmir House New Delhi.
3. The Chief Engineer, Southern Command Pune, Maharastra. Pune, Maharastra.
4 The Registrar, C.A.T., Hyderabad Branch, Hyderabad.
5 2CD copies.