Telangana High Court
ARBAPPL/195/2023 of M/s. Jyoti Audio Visual Pvt. Ltd. Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) on 29 December 2023
'r?', ., 'r] I I :i., ',#++; r$ *; : i., ; t$ir ' i,# I"it;d1i r :t' i +i ? j 1 ;l l! :i ,.:l ,\t- J ,; ,i*:*x, rffi$l Sl)'F i r&fti f'ti+ '$ I : i I t ! I tri, r' t ;f, 'l 1,, l.i: \' 'i :', i, l. Iii 6l!:t i i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA . ATHYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
I
iI\\' ['i]Iiii'$i,:',6l!:IN THE HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]t. ATHYDERABADtl.i!;,rFRIDAY,THE TWENTY [NINTH DAY OF ][DECEMBER]I{$!;f,TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREEtri,I:'r?', 'r] [I ].,[I]'l 1,,l., PRESENTr':i.,i:t THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: [I][9s ][oF ][2023]
Between:
M/s. Jyoti Audio Visual Pvt. Ltd., 3 and 5 [Diamond Cornplex, ][JN ][Road'.Abjds,]Hyderibad, Telangana- 500001. Represented [by ][its ][Director ][Mr. ][Balakrishna]Girjarathi, aged 62 lears, R/o. Hyderabad. ...APPLICANT'ri ; :i}AND
I
.{Employees' State lnsurance Corporation State lnsurance Corporation [(ESIC), ][Medical Collegd ][and ][Hospital.]rlSanattinagar, [[Hyderabad- 50003E. Represented by its Dean]]',#++; ; r$ *;*;t;f:i, f:i, I : l .{Employees' State lnsurance Corporation State lnsurance Corporation trlSanattinagar, [[Hyderabad- 50003E. Represented by its Dean]]',#++; ; r$ *;*;I : ...RESPONDENTt;f:i, f:i, Il: i., ;I't$ir -i'.i ; [Arbitration Application Under Section ][11 ][(6) ][of the Arbitration & Conciliation]Ii,# [I"i]-IAcU i.ril;[1996 ][Rl/w. ][Scheme ][. ][for ][Appointment ][of ][Arbitrator' ][2000 ][praying ][that ][this]ti.t;d1iflHon'ble [Court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][kindly. ][take ][the ][necessary measures ][for]fr :t' it.-iappointment [of ][bn ][Hon'ble ][Sole ][Arbitrator ][in terms ][of ][clause ][35 of ][the ][Tender]Document dated 08-04-2020 to [resolve ][the ][disputes between ][the ][Applicant ][and]; the Respondent [arising out of the said agreement.]
'!r.1i:;
I
'lCounsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SHIV ROHAN SINGH
l
,.Counsel for the Respondent: SRI [RAVINDER REDDY MUPPU]
: 11
I
: 11. : Court made the following made the following the following following ORDER ::[The . : Court made the following made the following the following following ORDER ::[The lil!,i*:*x,fr*+I:iittF,.:lrffi$l?j1.,:iaxiffiSl)'F r&fti,s[;l1tIiI,\t-{,;Jf'ti+Iiififfi.i:t:a '{
t.i
HBLEEIEFCEARBITRATIoNAPPLICATION No.195 of2023ORDER, Heard Mr. Shiv Rohan Singh, learoed counsel flor the applicant and Mr. Ravinder Rcddy Muppu, learned counsel forthe respondent.
2. This applicarion undcr Section 11(6) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 @ncfly [.the ]A&C Act) has beenfiled seeking appointment o[ sole arbitrator to resolve thedispute between the parties.
3. The applicant was issued work order dated 0g.09.2020.Admittedly, dispute has ariscn between the parties. Clause 35of the Tender Document contains an arbitration clause, whichreads as under:
Arbiuation: In the evcnt of any dispute or difference arising out of the teffns andconditions laid down in rhis tcnder, the sameshall be referred to the r\rbirrator appointed bythe Dean. The procedurc oF the Arbitrarion willbe governcd by the provision of Arbitration Act,,.:r'be governcd by the provision of Arbitration Act,,.:r'
1996 as amended and mles framed thereinunder.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no obiection flor appointrnent of a solc arbitrator.
5. Thercfore, Mr. B.Gautam Prasad, retired Principal District and Scssions Judge, Suryapet (resident of PavanapuriColony, I(armanghat, 8-4-31/1, Saroornagar, Ranga ReddyDistrict, Ilyderabad),ISappointed as sole arbitrator toadjudicatc the disputc bctween the parties.
6. Parties shall appear along with a copy o[ this orderbeflore the Arbitrator ot 27.07.2024 at 11:00 a.m.
7. Accordingly, the Arbitration Application is disposed of.No costs.
8. Ofhce to communicate a copy of this order to theIearned Arbitrator.
As a sequel, mrscellaneous [pcdrions, ][pending ][if ][ary,]
stand closed.
SD/. M.VIJAYA [BHASKER]JOOINT REGISTRAR
-,/
\
t/a'/
/ITRUE COPY//a'/SECTION OFFICER
,.5ToiI Sri e. Gautam Prasad, retired Principal District and Sessions Judge'i srw"p"i, [[R/o. ][Pavanapuri Colony, ]][[Pavanapuri Colony, ]]Iaryangh.a!.# [[84-3111' ]][Saroornagar']'l District" [[Hvo"tit"o"( ]][[Bv special Messenger) ]][( ][along ][with ][a]n"',iEi Choy Choy District" I [[copiof ]][[afridavit and material ]][[papers) ]][[: ]]- --i. ii'.is.o.o.s. [[sectioni ][Higi;Co-'rttol ]][[Higi;Co-'rttol ]][[tni ][State of ][T-elirngana ]][[State of ][T-elirngana ]][[T-elirngana ]][[at ][Hvderabad']][[Hvderabad']]
i I ,li srw"p"i, [[R/o. ][Pavanapuri Colony, ]][[Pavanapuri Colony, ]]Iaryangh.a!.# [[84-3111' ]]I t ,l [.i*.]'l n"',iEi Choy Choy District" [[Hvo"tit"o"( ]][[Bv special Messenger) ]]I [[copiof ]][[afridavit and material ]][[papers) ]][[: ]]- --iFiifirt*i. ii'.is.o.o.s. [[sectioni ][Higi;Co-'rttol ]][[Higi;Co-'rttol ]][[tni ][State of ][T-elirngana ]][[State of ][T-elirngana ]][[T-elirngana ]][[at ][Hvderabad']][[Hvderabad']]iifit;. o;;6ai; [snr. ][sxrV ][ndnnn ][slNGH, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]it ;*;. o;; ca i; [sni. ][nnvrNoen ][REDDY MUPPU, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]5. Two [CD ]CoPies '.it,ff,'tt\.\-ili.*iiff'i t
1
:l$t*rtr rt:il 1:[+]+{1
I
.;idiIIlsrcnCOURT+t*,fr,iL,i:i!It,iDATED:2911212023i;,i [I]&ir?iJ1"1't rFl [,i']
,r,Ei1,ionoen.,t1SE[STAI]A'. iJ. 't..{t',* ;::t +:ff*l,r*r,oN APPLICATION No.195 of [2023]vzIiiEt;:.It!!':It!Ei:if ".1 ,!'.[-],t.-iGf+tit E#fi,!.Id *[osJrN2o2r]o.tEl',a ,i Dggp4lCffi,a$I:il::pl;DTSPOSING OF THE ARB]TRATION [APPLICATION.]'.]i:' :i !.:l-iiii :ii;:-,Il?A-L1Ei ; $fl$,st3 h i 1,' [; ]r ['-15'$,f]'...i :tiIi :: t ',irl!'I#(.tH hl t : [rt:*t]:I .i','ffiI.:tl: I i.:.li,l :.!:.