Telangana High Court

WP/7575/2018 of Sri. V. Naga Vara Prasad, Vs The State of Telangana, on 30 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER wP NO.7575 0F 2018: Between: AND Sri. V. Naga Vara Prasad,, S/o. Rama Kotaiah aged about 69 years, Occ Retd.

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENT

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

t.A.NO.1 0F 2020IN/ANDWRIT PETITION NO: 7575 OF 2018

wP NO.7575 0F 2018:

Between:

Sri. V. Naga Vara Prasad,, S/o. Rama Kotaiah aged about 69 years, Occ Retd. Employee,R/o. Flat No.306, Luxor Heights, Alkapur Township, Puppalaguda, Rajendra NagarI\/andal' Ranga Reddy District

...pErroNER

AND

1. The State of Telangana,, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad2. The Joint Collector,, IVedchal - lvlalkajgiri District.

3. The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer,, lValkajgiri Division,l\,4edchal - tValkajgiri District

4. The lr/andal Revenue Officer,, Keesar Mandal, Ir/edchal - Malkajgiri District.5. Smt. Jhansi Chowdary, W/o. Sri. C.K. Naidu Aged about 47 yeari, Occ Doctor R/o. H.No.21, Phase - l, Vasantha Valley White Field, Kondapur, Hyderabad.

, ..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Orders indirection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Orders inRevision Case No. D119612017 dt. 18-02-2017 of the Respondent No.2 confirming the ordersin Appeal A2175912016 dt. 4-10-2016 of the Respondent No.3 as iltegal, arbitrary,in Appeal A2175912016 dt. 4-10-2016 of the Respondent No.3 as iltegal, arbitrary,unreasonable and Violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, consequentlyset aside the same lA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section ['1 ]51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of theRespondent No. 2 passed in Revisron Case No. C1196t2017 dt. 18-12-2017 comfirming theorders of respondent No. 3 in appeal Case No. A2175912016 dt, 04-.10-2016

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section ['1 ]51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner towithdraw the Writ Petition as not pressedCounsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. RAVINDER REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE

Counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI p. SRIDHAR REDDy The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

I.A.No.1 of 2020in /andWRIT PETITION No.7575 of 2018

I.A.No.1 of 2020 is filed by the petitioner, under Section151 of C.P.C seeking permission of this Court to withdraw thewrit petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused thereco rd .

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatthe petitioner and the respondent No.5 have setfled the subjectmatter outside of the Court and hence, seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the writ petition.

4. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.

5. Accordingly, LA.No.l of 2020 is allowed and consequently,the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMIASSISTANT REGISAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,1. One CC to Sri A Ravinder Reddy Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State [of ][Telangana. ][OUT]

3. One CC to Sri P Sridhar Reddy, Advocate [(OPUC)]

4. Two CD CopiesIVBC),\.!k{-

DATED: 3011212020

1r-lStA(Jzoo0 I JAil [2021]*05ORDER

!.A.NO.1 0F 2020IN/ANDWRIT PETITION NO: 7575 OF 2018

ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.1 OF 2O2O&DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,WITHOUT COSTS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead