Telangana High Court
WP/28430/2007 of Sridhar Madhava Rao Piprode Vs The Secretary, Regional Transport of Authority on 31 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 28430 OF 2007 Dated : December 31, 2007 Between: Sridhar Madhava Rao Piprode Petitioner AND The Asst. Secretary, Regional Transport
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OFANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIAND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.28430 OF 2007
Dated : December 31, 2007
Between:
Sridhar Madhava Rao Piprode
Petitioner
AND
The Asst. Secretary,Regional Transport Authority (South Zone),Adilabad, Adilabad District and another Respondents THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.28430 OF 2007
ORAL ORDER:(per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI)
The petitioner’s motor vehicle bearing TemporaryRegistration No.70/MH31/06 with EngineNo.4751DT14GTZP97238 and ChasisNo.607144GTZPA1307 was seized by the 2[nd]respondent on 23.08.2007 vide Vehicle Check ReportNo.0898917 for certain irregularities pointed out in thesaid vehicle check report. The seizure was affected underSection 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The grievance ofthe petitioner is that the respondents have not yetreleased the vehicle.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader for Transport.
Since no purpose would be served by keeping thevehicle in the custody of the respondents and the vehiclewould only get damaged, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the respondents to forthwith release the subjectmotor vehicle to the interim custody of the petitionersubject to the petitioner depositing Rs.10,000/- (Rupeesten thousands only) and on filing an undertaking that hewould not transfer the vehicle pending enquiry and that hewould produce the vehicle as and when the same isrequired by the respondent authorities in the course ofenquiry and investigation. No order as to costs.
With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.No order as to costs.
____________________T.MEENA KUMARI, J.
December 31, 2007
____________G.ROHINI, J.
Copy in two days.//BO//MAS