Telangana High Court
WP/27777/2007 of B. Sesha Rao S/o B. Gopal Rao Vs The Commissioner of Endowments Department, on 27 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.27777 of 2007 Dated: 27.12.2007 Between B.Sesha Rao and others. …Petitioners And The Commissioner of Endowments Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.27777 of 2007
Dated: 27.12.2007
Between
B.Sesha Rao and others.
…Petitioners
And
The Commissioner of Endowments Department,Tilak Road, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION No.27777 of 2007
The matter is coming up for admission.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also thelearned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments representingthe respondents.
This writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of respondent No.1 in not considering therepresentation of the petitioners, dated 06.10.2007, as illegal, arbitraryand violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to directthe respondents not to evict the petitioners from their shops bearingNos.5-30/A, 5-30/B, 5-30/C, 5-30/D and 5-30/E respectively situated at Sri Kanaka Durga Temple,Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad till the disposal of their representation dated06.10.2007 and to pass such other suitable orders.
Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in supportof the writ petition. It is also stated that aggrieved by the orders passedin O.A.Nos.74 to 78 of 2007, dated 24.10.2007 and 05.12.2007 treatingthe petitioners as encroachers, the petitioners filed R.P.Nos.44 to 48 of2007 before the second respondent and the same are pendingdisposal. Several further facts also had been offered in the affidavitfiled in support of the writ petition.
Since it is stated that R.P.Nos.44 to 48 of 2007 are said to bepending on the file of the second respondent, let the secondrespondent dispose of the same, within a period of four weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, status quo, obtainingas on today, shall be maintained.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
_________________P.S.Narayana, JDate: 27.12.2007Note: Furnish CC in two days B/o