Telangana High Court
WP/27266/2005 of Jonnalagadda Narayana Rao Vs The Registrar of A.P. Cooperative Societies, Government on 23 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.27266 OF 2005 Dated: 23-12-2005 Between Jonnalagadda Narayana Rao, S/o. Sarvothama Rao, Vice President, Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Limited, Buchireddypalem Village and Mandal, Nellore District and others. …PETITIONERS AND The Registrar
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.27266 OF 2005
Dated: 23-12-2005
Between
Jonnalagadda Narayana Rao, S/o. Sarvothama Rao, Vice President, Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Limited, Buchireddypalem Village and Mandal, Nellore District and others.
AND
The Registrar of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies,Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others.
…PETITIONERS
…RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioners question the action of the respondents in not considering and disposing therepresentation dated 19.12.2005 filed by them for the purpose of holding re-election for theVavveru Cooperative Society.
Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the elections tothe said society have already been conducted.
Section 61(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act (for short ‘the Act’), 1964, deals with the dispute relating to the conduct of election. Under Section 61(3) of theAct every dispute relating to, or in connection with, any election to a committee of a Societyshall be referred for decision to the Tribunal having jurisdiction over the area.
Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief in this writ petition filed under Article226 of the Constitution of India as the elections are already conducted.
In view of the effective alternative remedy available to the petitioners under Section 61(3) ofthe Act, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to file anelection petition.
December 23, 2005
______________
V. ESWARAIAH, J
DSK