Telangana High Court
WP/33190/2010 of V. Venugopal Reddy Vs The Principal Secretary, on 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33190 of 2010 Date: 31.12.2010 Between : V. Venugopal Reddy … Petitioner And The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT
Date: 31.12.2010
Between :
V. Venugopal Reddy
… Petitioner
And
The Principal Secretary,Home Department,Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well asthe learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing forrespondent Nos.1 to 5.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by wayof Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in interfering withhis life and liberty at the instance of respondent Nos.6 and 7 withoutfollowing due process of law as arbitrary and illegal andconsequently sought a direction to respondent Nos.4 and 5 not tointerfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and take immediateaction pursuant to the complaint, dated 14.12.2010.
3. Respondent No.7 is the wife of the petitioner andrespondent No.6 is the father of respondent No.7. It is the grievanceof the petitioner that though there is no crime registered against him,there is interference by the official respondents with his life andliberty at the instance of the respondent Nos.6 and 7.
4. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned GovernmentPleader for Home that there was a complaint by the parents of thepetitioner that the petitioner is missing. However, as the petitioner isvery much available, no case is registered. It is also submitted thatrespondent Nos.4 and 5 are not interfering with the life and liberty ofthe petitioner.
5. Recording the said statement made by the learnedGovernment Pleader that the respondent Nos.4 and 5 are notinterfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner, the writ petition isdisposed of, at the admission stage. There shall be no order as tocosts.
_______________________________
JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
31.12.2010.Msr
31.12.2010(Msr)