Telangana High Court
CRLP/15278/2013 of Maruprolu Satyavathi (A23) Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. KANTHA RAO CRL.P. No. 15278 of 2013 Between: 1. Maruprolu Satyavathi ( A .23) W/o Late Sree Rama Murthy Reddy 2. Kukkala Sankaramma ( A .38)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEENPRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. KANTHA RAOCRL.P. No. 15278 of 2013
Between:
1.Maruprolu Satyavathi (A.23) W/o Late Sree Rama MurthyReddyReddy
2.Kukkala Sankaramma (A.38) W/o Rami Reddy
3.Koki Sriravamma (A.54) W/o Rami Reddy
Petitioners(Accused Nos. 23, 38
and 54
(in Crime No. 77 of 2013 on
thefile of Chinaganjam P.S., Prakasam District.)AND
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofA.P., Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri Naga PraveenVankayalapatiCOUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Additional PublicProsecutor Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in thecircumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, theHigh Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in theevent of the petitioners arrest in connection with Crime no. 77 of 2013o f Chinaganjam Police Station, Chinaganjam Mandal, PrakasamDistrict.
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-A23, A38 andA54 under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seekinganticipatory bail in Crime No.77 of 2013 of Chinaganjam PoliceStation, Prakasam District, registered for the offence punishableunder Sections 143, 147, 342, 353, 506, 509 and 149 of IPC andSec.7 of CLA Act, 1932 and Sections 220 and 221 of A.P.PanchayatRaj Act, 1994.
Page 1 of 2
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners –A23, A38 and A54 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutorrepresenting the respondent-state.
3. The incident arose during the recent panchayat elections. No specific overt acts have been attributed to the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due tovillage politics, the petitioners are involved in the present case. Having regard to the nature of allegations made in the FIR, I aminclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners – A23, A38 andA54.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and thepetitioners-A23, A38 and A54 are therefore directed to surrenderbefore the Station House Officer, Chinaganjam Police Station,Prakasam District, within twenty days from today and thereafter, they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bonds for a sumof Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties forthe like sum each to the satisfaction of the said SHO.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To1.The I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ongole,Prakasam District.1.The I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ongole,Prakasam District.2.The Station House Officer, Chinnaganjam Police Station,Prakasam DistrictPrakasam District
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT)(OUT)
4. One CC to Sri. Naga Praveen Venkayalapati, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One Spare copy
BV
HIGH COURT
RKR.J
DATED: 31-12-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CRL.P.NO.15278 OF 2013
GRANTING BAIL IN THE
DRAFTED: BY BVDATED : 02-01-2014
HIGH COURTRKR.J
DATED: 31-12-2013
CRL.P.NO.15278 OF 2013
GRANTING BAIL IN THEEVENT OF ARREST
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…