Telangana High Court
CRP/3097/2015 of K ANASUYAMMA AND ANOTHER Vs G BALAIAH , AGGU BALAIAH AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL EVISION PETITION NO : 3097 0F 2015 Petition under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order daled 27
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVIBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVILEVISION PETITION NO : 3097 0F 2015
Petition under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdaled 27 .07.2o15 in l.A.No.7 of 2015 in o.S.No.4599 of 2008 on the file of the courtof the Principal Rent Controller -cum- 12th Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad.
Between:
1. K. Anasuyamma, Wo Late K. Achaiah, aged about 68 years, Occ: Household,2. K. Karun Kumar Yadav, S/o Late K. Achaiah, aged about 37 years, Occ:Business,2. K. Karun Kumar Yadav, S/o Late K. Achaiah, aged about 37 years, Occ:Business, Both are Rl/o. H.No. CIB Quarter No.14 B, MCH No.6-1-269, Ap Housing Board,Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT Nos.1 & 3
AND
1. G. Bal{ah @ Aggu-Balaiah, S/o G. Pentaiah @ ASSu pentaiah, aged about 69years, Occ: Retd., Service, F/o H.No.6-1-271 , Kairatabad, Hyderabad.years, Occ: Retd., Service, F/o H.No.6-1-271 , Kairatabad, Hyderabad.
.,.RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF
2. A. Sitamma, W/o. Late K. Achaiah.
(Died on 02.07.2012, therefore not necessary party)
..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT NO,1
CRPMP. NO:4128 OF 2015
Page 1 of 4
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedings including execution of warrant by the Advocate Commissioner as per theorders d1.27.07.2015 made in l.A.No.7 of 2015 in O.S.No.4599 of 2008 on the file ofthe Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad pending disposal of CRP of 2015
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI B. AJAY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE l ION'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
CwI: , REVISION PETITION No.3O9Z of 20lS
ORDER:
This C R.p. is filed by the defendants in the suit,questioning t he order d.ated 27 .7 .2O 15 passed in I.A.No.7 of2015 in O.S No.4599 of 2OOg on the file of principal RentController-cu n-XII Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad.
2. The suit in O.S.No.4S99 of 200g was filed for mandatoryinjunction to Cemolish the illegal and unlawful constructionon upper thrr e floors of defendants 1 and 2 on the plaintiffproperlr's co' nmon wall. In the said suit, plaintiff firedI.A.No.7 of 2O 5 under Order 26 Rule 9 read with Section l5 1of CPC to aptr oint an Advocate Commissioner to note downthe physical fe rtures incruding measurement of lt,a1ls betweenCIB Quarter r{o.15/B and, 14 lB. The trial Court, afterconsidering th : matter, allowed the application by impugnedorder dated 2,.2.2015, appointing Mr.B.preetam Singh, asAdvocate Comr rissioner to note down the physical features inbetween CIB ( uarter Nos. l5/B and l4/B and also to notedown in his rr port whether there exists a common waII inbetween both .he quarters and also to measure the jointcommon wall ir. between the said quarters. euestioning thesaid order, th: present revision petition is liled theby defendants.
Page 2 of 4
3. According to the learned counsel for revisionpetitioners/ defendants, the suit is filed for mandatoryinjunction for demolition of the constructed portion of thedefendants and it is for the piaintiff to plead and prove hiscase instead of collecting evidence through AdvocateCommissioner. It is further stated that the plaintiff is asubsequent purchaser to that of defendants and he cannot bealiowed to contend that the wall between the parties is acommon wall, which is contrary to the record and withoutany valid proof. It is also stated that the defendants havepurchased the property on 8.4.1969, much prior to thepurchase of plaintiff's mother who purchased on 9.6. 1994.
4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners/defendants submitted that in the written statement filed bydefendants, it is categorically stated that in the sale deed ofplaintiff's mother in respect of Qr.No.15/B, no common wal1is mentioned in the recitals or it was shown in the planannexed to the sale deed and there is no common wallexisting between plaintiff and the defendants quarters,therefore, the question of encroachment on to the allegedcommon wa1l by the defendants does not arise. Therefore, theimpugned order passed by the trial Court, directing theAdvocate Commissioner to note down the physical features ofthe subject property and also to note there exists a common /
wall or not, is arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the record andtherefore liabl: to be set aside.
5. Heard tl Le learned counsel for revision petitioners andperused the rr cord.
6. Since tl e defendants specifically contended in theirwritten staten ent that there is no common wall in existencebetween the plaintiff.and defendants, the impugned order ofthe trial Court appointing the Advocate Commissioner to notedown whether there exists a common wall or not is errorapparent on t he.face of the record and is liable to be setaside.
Accordin 31y, the C.R.P. is allowed, setting aside theorder dated 27.7.2015 passed in I.A.No.7 of 2015 inO.S.No.4599 c12008 on the file of principal Rent Controller-cum-XII Juni< r Civil Judge, Hyderabad. There shall be noorder as to c )sts. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall stand closed.
{iD/-K.SAILESHIASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Page 3 of 4
\V,
SECTION OFFICER
To,l The Principar Re rt controrer^-c.u.m- 12rh Junior civir J-udge. Hyderabad.?. 3. One 9n" cc [CC ]to [to Sri L. prabhakar ]sri B. Ajay, Advocate [neao_v, ]t',cjpUci--* nolocai" ioEijlr[,-' ]"'4. Two CD Cooies5. One Spare bopygbrl The Principar Re rt controrer^-c.u.m- 12rh Junior civir J-udge. Hyderabad.?. 3. One 9n" cc [CC ]to [to Sri L. prabhakar ]sri B. Ajay, Advocate [neao_v, ]t',cjpUci--* nolocai" ioEijlr[,-' ]"'4. Two CD Cooies5. One Spare bopygbr HIGH COURT
DATED: 3111212021
IyrE [STAi'6]O1 \/i.,+/t:)o15 [ttts]2{i22o\.cORDER'\iCRP.No.3097 of 2015ALLOWING TIIE CRP)L\-,vl
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…