Telangana High Court

WP/29101/2008 of Mohd. Yousuf Ali, Vs The Commissioner of Cooperation and Registrar of on 31 December 2008

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 29101 of 2008 Between: Mohd. Yousuf Ali, S/o. late Mohd. Ahmed Ali, R/o.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO : 29101 of 2008

Between:

Mohd. Yousuf Ali, S/o. late Mohd. Ahmed Ali, R/o. H.No. 14-1-225/1, Mangalhat, Hyderabad, President of the Mustafa RoselandCooperative Housing Society Limited, (TAB-91) Having its Regd. Office at No. 17-1-391/M/164, Khaja Bagh,Saidabad, Hyderabad.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 The Commissioner of Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, MJ Road,Hyderabad-I.

2 The District Collector-Election Authority, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad.

3 Election Officer, Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing' Society Limited, O/o. the Divisional Cooperative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order ordirection more particularly one in th enature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondents in issuing election notification dated 17-11-2008 and going ahead with theelectionprocess for the Mustafa Roseland Cooperative Housing Society Limited (TAB-91)even after coming to know about the orders passed in Review WPMP NO. 34955 of 2008 inWrit Petition in W.P.No. 9523/2007 as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently declarethat the election process initiated by the authorities to Mustafa Roseland Cooperative HousingSociety Limited is null and void and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.S.MURTHY

Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION

The Court made the following :

Page 1 of 2

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION No.29101 of 2008

ORDER:

Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned GovernmentPleader for Cooperation and with their consent the writ petition is being disposed of at thestage of admission.

While several contentions are urged in the writ petition, Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that it would suffice if thisCourt were to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representationsubmitted by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for Cooperation would state that therepresentation submitted by the petitioner has already been considered and orders werepassed thereon. If it be so, the said order shall be communicated to the petitioner.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.

____________

31-12-2008

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead