Telangana High Court
WP/27810/2005 of Pothuraju Peddakontaiah, Vs The Commissioner of Fisheries, on 29 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27810 OF 2005 DATED: 29-12-2005 Between: Pothuraju Peddakotaiah . . .Petitioner And The Commissioner of Fisheries, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad, and others . . . .Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.27810 OF 2005
DATED: 29-12-2005
Between:
Pothuraju Peddakotaiah . . .Petitioner
And
The Commissioner of Fisheries, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad, and others . . . .Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.27810 of 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
The petitioner claims that himself and 19 others, being the members ofthe Fishermen Cooperative Society, the 7[th] respondent herein, submittedseveral representations to respondents 1 to 6, alleging that the President of theSociety is acting detrimental, to the interests of the members and requestingthem to conduct enquiry. He complains that no action has been taken on therepresentations and seeks appropriate directions in this regard.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleaderfor Fisheries.
After obtaining instructions from the fifth respondent, the learned GovernmentPleader submits that the seventh respondent paid the lease amount on 26-12-2005 and that necessary orders enabling it to carry on fishing operations wereissued on 28-12-2005.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the President of the Society is actingdetrimental to the interest of the members and are not being permitted toparticipate in fishing operations.
Inasmuch as the orders enabling the seventh respondent to carry on fishingoperations, were issued only on 28-12-2005, the petitioner and other memberscan certainly participate in the operations. The fifth respondent shall ensurethat interests of the members of the society are adequately protected and thatthey participate, in fishing operations.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________
kvni