Telangana High Court
WA/2544/2005 of G.Ravinder, Vs The Principal Secretary to Government (Panchayat Raj on 26 December 2005
SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.2544 OF 2005 AND WRIT PETITION No.22821 OF 2005 Between: G. Ravinder, S/o. Veeraiah, aged about 35 years, Sarpanch, Chigurumamidi Gram Panchayat, Chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar District. .. Appellant/Petitioner
HONOURABLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.2544 OF 2005
AND
WRIT PETITION No.22821 OF 2005
Between:
G. Ravinder, S/o. Veeraiah,
aged about 35 years, Sarpanch,
Chigurumamidi Gram Panchayat,
Chigurumamidi Mandal,
Karimnagar District.
.. Appellant/Petitioner
AND
The Principal Secretary to Government
(Panchayat Raj and Rural Development)
Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 2 others
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::JUDGMENT::
Counsel for the appellant/petitioner :Mr. C.V. Bhaskar ReddyCounsel for Respondents/Respondents:G.P. for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development 26th December, 2005
Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ
This is an appeal for setting aside order dated 24-10-2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.M.P.No.29239 of 2005 (W.P. No.22821 of 2005) whereby he rejected theappellant’s prayer for setting aside of orders dated 05-02-2005 and 26-09-2005passed by District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Karimnagar and PrincipalSecretary to Government (Panchayat Raj and Rural Development) respectivelyunder the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 in the matter of theappellant’s suspension from the post of Sarpanch.
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the appellantsubmitted that his client will feel satisfied if the Court issues a direction torespondents 2 and 3 to complete the enquiry pending against him within aspecified time-frame.
Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development saysthat enquiry pending against the appellant will be completed within a maximumperiod of four weeks from today.
In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, we donot consider it necessary to go into the merits of the order of the learned SingleJudge or the orders impugned in the writ petition and dispose of the appeal with a direction that the enquiry pending against the appellant shall be completedand appropriate order passed by the competent authority within a period of fourweeks from today.
Learned Counsel for the appellant says that W.P. No.22821 of 2005 filed by his client challenging order dated 26-09-2005may also be disposed of in similar terms. Ordered accordingly.
G.S. SINGHVI, C.J.
Date:26-12-2005
PV
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J