Telangana High Court
ITTA/69/2024 of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 1 Vs Nagam Dinakar Reddy on 31 December 2024
rN rHE HrGH couRlffi$DrffiA?rl$E oF TELANGANA r u E s DAY;r+1i';rsffi 'l[s"f;['-?{ P53F* " * PRESENT THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE THE HONOURABLE AND TICE J SREENNAS RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUS PEA NO :69 oF2024 ETAX TRtBUNAL AP INcoM 260 A of the lncome Tax Act' 1961 against the O of the
[ [3418 ][]]
oF [TELANGANA]rN [rHE ][HrGH ][couRlffi$DrffiA?rl$E ]
r u [E ][s ][DAY;r+1i';rsffi ]'l[s"f;['-?{ [P53F* ][" ][*]
PRESENT
THE [CHIEF JUSTICE ][ALOK ][ARADHE]THE [HONOURABLE]ANDTICE [J SREENNAS ][RAO]THE [HONOURABLE ][SRI ][JUS]
PEALNO[:69][o][F2][024]
ETAX[TRtB][UN][AL][ AP]IN[[coM]]
IN[[coM]]260 [A ][of the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act']Tribunal [APPeal under ]lncome [Tax]daled22-12'2021 [on ][the ][file]017,rder [made in ][l'T ][A No ][529/HYd/2]1961 [against ][the O]Bench ['A"]HYderabad [for ][the]pellate [Tribunal' ][HYderabad]ApPealof the [lncome ][Tax ][AP]Assessment [Y ][eat ][20][13-14, ][Preferred ][agal][nst][ the ][Order made ][in]No.0032/20'1 [5-16 dated][ 28-12-2016 ][on the ][file of the ][Commissioner of lncome ][Tax']Appeals [12, ][HYderab][ad ][Preferred ][against][ the ][Order made ][in ][PAN/GIR]No.ADEPNS214E, [dated][ 30-03-2015 on the file][ of ][DePutY ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome]Tax, Central [Circle ][2(4)' ][HYderabad]
"t*"ila",o"l commissioner [of lncome ][Tax-1 ]' [Hyderabad]
...APPellant
AND
Nagam [Dinakar Reddv' ][#23C' ][Hill ][Ridge ][Villas' ][Gachibowli' Hyderabad]
...ResPondent
Ms B Sapna [Reddy, ][Jr ][Standing ][Counsel]Counsel [for ][the APPellant]RepMrJVPrasadsi.'st"ttaing [Counsel ][for ][lncome Tax]
Department
'-'Counsel for the [ResPondent ][: ]
The Court delivered [the ][following ][Judgment ][:]
HON'BLETHEcEKHEANDHON'SRICE J.o
Page 1 of 2
INCOMETRIBAPPEAL No.69ot2o24
NT:
(f'er the Hon'bb the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Ms. B.lJapna
B.lJapnaReddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel Junior StandingCounsel representingMr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Cou:rsel SeniorStanding Cou:rsel forIncome Tax Department for theappellant.appellant.
2. Learned .lunior Stalding Counsel for the appeJlaltseeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the lightof the Circular No.09/2024, d,ated 12.Og.2O24, with theliberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of theappeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in theCircular No.S 12024 dated 15.03.2024.
'JAccordingllr, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty [as ]PraYed [for]
/
I
shallMiscellaneous [aPPlications][ pending, ][if ][anY']A BHABHASKERstand [closed' ][However' ][there shall ][be ][no ord]Sd,- d,- [[,1.][er ][ VIJAY][as ][to costs']
shall
A BHABHASKERSd,- d,- JO[INT REGIS][TRAR]SEloN [o][FFICER]
,TTRUE [COPY'/]
SE
1. [The ][tncome Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench'A ][' Hyderabad][[Hyderabad]][[Hyderabad]]
To,
1. 2. [The ][Commissioner of ][lncome ][Tax' ][Appeals 12' ][[Hyderabad]]central 2. [The ][Commissioner of ][lncome ][Tax' ][Appeals 12' ][[Hyderabad]]central central [circle 2(4)' ][Hvderabad]
3. [rhe ][Deputv ]"o'nrn'"'onl':;';;;:;'-' *ol [tjnior ][standing ][counser ror ][rncome ][rax]"o'nrn'"'onl':;';;;:;'-' *ol [tjnior ][standing ][counser ror ][rncome ][rax]t 3:;S:,:X|lb'rur['f 3:;S:,:X|lb'rur['f Two [CD ][Copies]
5. VAJgh
v)
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 tl2t2024
JUDGII,IENT
lTIA.No.69 of 2024
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS
WITHDRAWN
Sl'I,{!:.,d0tIri,i2lil:ii--\+to)i,,1
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…