Telangana High Court

WP/16089/2003 of RAHEEMUDDING(UNDER REMOVAL)NO00514030 Vs THE COMMANDANT 52 on 31 December 2021

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE Between: Raheemuddin (Under Removal) S/o. Sri Sh.Basheeruddin aged 32 Years, Office of Commandant 52 Bn BSF C/o 56 APO, now residing at Jagtial Village and

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI

WRIT PETITION NO: 16089 OF 2003

Between:Raheemuddin (Under Removal) S/o. Sri Sh.Basheeruddin aged 32 Years, Officeof Commandant 52 Bn BSF C/o 56 APO, now residing at Jagtial Village and PO,Jagtial P.S, Dist. Karimnagar 505327 (Constable No.00514030)

...PETITIONER

AND

The Commandant 52, Bn, Border Security Force, C/o. 56 APO

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondent in removing the petitioner fromservice vide Proceed ings No. Estt/Disc/Dismissed/THQ/528n1200317 1 49-7349, dated2-7 -2003 as arbitrary and illegal and set aside the same.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. SATYAM REDDY [(NOT ]PRESENT)

Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. K. SRIDEVI REP. FOR

SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO,ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL

The Court made the following: ORDER

\

THI HONO [JRABLE ][SMT. ][JLSI'ICE ][P. ][MAI)HAVI ][DE'VI]

WI IT PETITION[ NO.16089 ][0][If ][2003]

o RDF]I{

Page 1 of 2

There was no [representation ][for ][the petitioner ][or ][his ][counsel]when the matter [was taken ][up ][on ][30'12'2021' ][lt ][u'as ][accordingly]directed to be [liste ][d'for ][disrnissal' ][on31'12'2021 ][']

2. Today, yet rgain, [there ][is ][no ][representation ][for the petitioner or]his counsel [when ][.he ][matter is ][called' Ms' ][K' ][Sridcvi, ][learned ][counsel]representing [the ][l:arned ][Assistant ][Solicitor (leneral ][appearing ][lor ][the]respondent is Pres [ent.]

3.TheWritP:titionisaccordinglydismissedfornon-prosecution.

4. Pending rr iscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in ][this ][Writ ][Petition]shall also stand [d ][smissed. ][No ][costs.]

SD/.'T.JAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRARLr-//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRI [S. ][s ][ATYAM REDDY, Advocate ][IOPUC]]

2. one cc to Sri [Nan avarapu Rajeshwar ][Rao, ][Assistant ][solicitor ][General ][(oPUC)]

3. Two CD Copies.

4. One Spare [CoPY.]

MPNPJt

HIGH COURT

DATED:31 l'1212021

ORDER

WP.No.16089 oF 2003

DISMISSING TF E WRIT PETITIONFOR NON.PRO:;ECUT!ONWITHOUT COS"S

d\s@oa

, 1r^a\\..tvi.- .--'\-'s

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead