Telangana High Court
WP/8173/2003 of D.Uma Maheshwar Rao Vs The Chairman AND Managing Director, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8173 of 2003 Between: 1 Sri D. Uma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 8173 of 2003
Between:
1 Sri D. Uma Maheswara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, West, A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
2 Sri K. Kanaka Raju, S/o Chitti,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
3 Sri S. Ramakrishna, S/o Varahalu,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
3 Sri K. Prasada Rao, S/o Viswanadham,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
5 Sri B. Laxmana Rao, S/o Late Ramapathi Rao, A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
6 Sri S. Narasinga Rao, S/o Satyam,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
7 Sri V.V.S. Chandrasekhar, S/o V. Subba Rao, A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
8 Sri Ch. S.V.V. Prasada Rao, S/o Anantha Rao, A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
9 Sri D. Ramesh, S/o Seetharambabu,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
10 Sri A.V. Rama Rao, S/o Rambabu,
A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd, Visakhapatnam R/o Visakhapatnam.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Eastern Power Distribution Companyof A.P.Ltd, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam.of A.P.Ltd, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam.
2. The Chief General Manager (EO&EXPR) I/C, APEDCL, Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
3. The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle, APEPDCL,Opp.Green Park Hotel, Waltair Main Road,Visakhapatnam-2Opp.Green Park Hotel, Waltair Main Road,Visakhapatnam-2
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ, Order or Direction more especially one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 2[nd] respondent in conducting the disciplinaryproceedings against the petitioners in pursuance of the charge sheet vide FA &CCA/Peshi/D.No:82/03 dt.5.2.03 for the 1[st] petitioners and to the other petitionerscharge sheet Nos.FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.50;FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.56;FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.57;FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.61;FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.68;FA&CCA/Peshi/D.No.71; FA&CCA/Peshhi/D.No.72; dated 23.01.2003 under Regulations10(2)(a) of the APTRANSCO/DISCOMS disciplinary and Appeal Regulations, 1970is illegal, arbitrary and malafide and without application of mind and violativeprinciples of natural justice and set aside the same. Alternatively the respondentsmay be directed to supply of copies of all such documents sought to be relied uponand the respondents allow the petitioners to take assistance of defence assistant inview of the complicated nature of the allegations thrown at petitioners andappointment of enquiry officer should invariably be as per the Regulation 10(2)(a),and the petitioners may be allowed to exercise the right of appeal under Regulation7(a), and the petitioners may be allowed to exercise the right of appeal underRegulation 7(a) of APRTANCO/DISCOMS Disciplinary Appeal Regulations, 1970.
Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.SRINIVASA RAO KESAPRAGADA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SMT. E.URMILA SC for APEPDCL
The Court made the following Order: (per TMK,J)
In view of the orders passed by this Court in W.A.No.1990 of 2004, dated29.12.2004, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
____________________T.MEENA KUMARI,J
29-12-2004
_________________
S.ANANDA REDDY,J
Lvl/usd
To
Conclusion
1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam.
2. The Chief General Manager (EO&EXPR) I/C, APEDCL, Visakhapatnam.
3. The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle, APEPDCL,Opp.Green Park Hotel, Waltair Main Road,Visakhapatnam-2Opp.Green Park Hotel, Waltair Main Road,Visakhapatnam-2
4. Two CD copies.