Telangana High Court
WP/16784/2004 of S.K. Singh, Vs The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, on 28 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO.16784 OF 2004 BETWEEN: S.K.Singh son of Bailaram Singh …Pettioner vs. The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Walftair Division, Visakhapatnam and another. …Respondent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO.16784 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
S.K.Singh son of Bailaram Singh
vs.
The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Walftair Division,Visakhapatnam and another.
…Pettioner
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO.16784 OF 2004
ORAL ORDER
Sri V.V.Narasimham learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has been filed challenging the issuance of a charge sheet and that during thependency of the writ petition the disciplinary inquiry has been completed and anorder of punishment also imposed. As against the order of punishment, the petitionerpreferred an appeal unsuccessfully. In the circumstances submits the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the cause in the writ petition does not survive foradjudication. He further submits that the writ petition may be dismissed asinfructuous with liberty to assail the punishment order as confirmed in departmentalappeal before the appropriate forum urging all the questions as available to thepetitioner including the grounds urged herein.
In the light of the submissions made the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Thepetitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his appropriate remedies against thedepartmental inquiry, the order of punishment and the appellate order confirming theorder of punishment on all grounds as he may desire to urge in respect of hischallenge to the departmental proceedings. No costs.
_________________
GODA RAGHURAM,J
28[TH] DECEMBER,2005
*TSNR