WP/7262/2005 of V.Ramachandra Naidu Vs A.P.State Road Transport Corporation on 31 December 2014

Conclusion

COMMON ORDER:

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.

These writ petitions are filed challenging the proceedings, dated02-03-2005 and 16-03-2005 issued by the 2[nd] respondent.

In L.P.A.Nos.206 of 2002 and batch, dated 20-11-2012, the FullBench of this Court held that the Insurance Company alone is liable topay compensation.

In view of the same, the aforesaid proceedings issued by the 2[nd]respondent are set aside.

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order asto costs.

_____________________________

(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)

31.12.2014

Prv

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO

WRIT PETITION Nos.11883 and 7262 of 2005

31-12-2014