Telangana High Court
WP/38/2011 of Rudraraju Sivaprasad Varma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, on 30 December 2015
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 38 OF 2011 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of both parties, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. The present Writ Petition came to be filed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 38 OF 2011
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleaderfor Revenue. With the consent of both parties, the present writ petition is disposedof at the admission stage itself.
The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking to declare the action ofthe respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the land admeasuringAcs.14.76 cents in Survey Nos. 342-1A, 342-1C, 342-1C, 342-1B, 3A, 3B and 343-1, 2, 3 of Karakambadi Village and Survey Nos.155-1A, 2A, 3A, 160-1, 5,6,7, 9, 10,11B, 160-2, 3, 4, 8, 11A, 161-3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 165-8, 9 B, 10B, 11B, 166-2, 3, 4A,167-4, 5A, 5B of Erragunta Village of Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District, withoutfollowing due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary.
Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel forthe petitioners restricts his prayer seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 tofollow due process of law before taking any coercive steps against the petitioners. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue does not dispute the same.
Without going into merits of the case and having regard to thecircumstances stated above, the writ petition is disposed of directing therespondents not to dispossess the petitioners, without following the due process oflaw. No costs.
Consequently, the Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this WritPetition shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
30.12.2015vhb