Telangana High Court
CRLP/15295/2013 of Ravulapalli Ajay Kumar Vs The state of AP on 31 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. KANTHA RAO CRL.P. No. 15295 of 2013 Between: 1. Ravulapalli Ajay Kumar S/o Venkatramnarsaiah 2. Koyyada Venkataiah S/o Narsingam 3. Manda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEENPRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. KANTHA RAOCRL.P. No. 15295 of 2013
Between:
1.Ravulapalli Ajay Kumar S/o Venkatramnarsaiah
2.Koyyada Venkataiah S/o Narsingam
3.Manda Narsaiah S/o Rajaiah
4.Bommagani Veeralakshmi W/o Kommalu
5.Koyyada Rajesh S/o Venkanna
6.Puli Naveen S/o Narsaiah
7.Pull Prasad S/o Narsaiah
8.Thota Tirupathi S/o Buchiramulu
9.Puli Rajitha W/o Prasad
10.Koyyada Venkanna S/o Veeraiah
11.Udugula Balakrishna S/o Upender
12.Erram Kavitha W/o Mahender
13.Thota Yekambaram W/o Durgaiah
Petitioners(Accused Nos. 3 to 6, 8 to 10, 13,16 to 20
(in Crime No. 120 of 2012on the
file of Chennaraopet P.S., Warangal District.)AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its S.H.O., P.S. Chennaraopet,Warangal District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant
Page 1 of 3
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri D. Y.N. L. N.CharyuluCOUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Additional PublicProsecutor Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in thecircumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, theHigh Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitionerswith a direction to release them on bail in the event of their arrestrelating to the Crime No. 120 of 2012, dated 20.10.2012 on the file ofthe P.S. Chennaraopet, Warangal District.
2. )
(Contd.
ORDER:
“This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-accusedunder Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seekinganticipatory bail in Crime No.120 of 2012 of Chennaraopet PoliceStation, Warangal District, registered for the offence punishableunder Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners – accused 3 to 6, 8 to 10, 13, 16 to 20 and the learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-state.
3. It is alleged against the petitioners and several otheragriculturists that they obtained loans by producing false pattadarpassbooks and title deeds. Learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners submits that the revenue officials processed the loanapplications and the petitioners by themselves did not produceany documents for the purpose of obtaining loans issued by therevenue authorities. The learned counsel would submit that thepetitioners have repaid the loans borrowed by them. In view ofthe above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and thepetitioners –A3 to A6, A8 to A10, A13, A16 to A20 are thereforedirected to surrender before the Station House Officer,Chennaraopet Police Station, Warangal District, within twentydays from today and thereafter, they shall be released on bail ontheir executing personal bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupeesten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum eachto the satisfaction of the said SHO. “
Page 2 of 3
//TRUE COPY//
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Junior Civil Judge, Narsampet,2.The Station House Officer, Chennaraopet Police Station,Warangal District
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT)
4. One CC to Sri. D.Y. N. L. N. Charyulu, Advocate (OPUC)5. One Spare copyBV
HIGH COURT
RKR.J
DATED: 31-12-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CRL.P.NO.15295 OF 2013
GRANTING BAIL IN THEEVENT OF ARREST
DRAFTED: BY BV
DATED : 02-01-2014
DATED: 31-12-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CRL.P.NO.15295 OF 2013
GRANTING BAIL IN THEEVENT OF ARREST
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…