Telangana High Court
WP/4129/1994 of Someswara Swamy Temple Vs Arisetty Bhavanarayana on 27 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4129 of 1994 Between: Someswara Swamy Temple, Kattevaram Village, Tenali Mandal,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 4129 of 1994
Between:
Someswara Swamy Temple, Kattevaram Village,Tenali Mandal, Guntur Dist, repd. by its Executive Officer,Ch.Somayya.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Arisetty Bhavanarayana, S/o.late Koti Nagaiah, Nandivelugu, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District.2 Arisetty Nageswara Rao. S/o.Koti Nagaiah R/o.Nandivelugu, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District.
3 Arisetty Venkata Rao, S/o.Koti Nagaiah, R/o.Nandivelugu, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District.
4 The Special Officer under Tenancy Act-cum-Principal District Munsi,f Tenali, Guntur District. Tenali, Guntur District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate a writ, order or direction more especially one inthe nature of writ of prohibition directing the 4th respondent Tribunal forbiddingfrom continuing with the proceedings in ATC.No.47/93 and IA.No.2034/93 asthe same is without jurisdiction.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.R.PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: MR. V.S.R.ANJANEYULU
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Notice was issued to the petitioner pursuant to the order of this Courtdated 22.07.2004. In spite of service of notice, there is norepresentation either by the petitioner or by the learned counsel onrecord, who filed appearance earlier. Therefore, the writ petition isdismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
27.12.2004
DR
To
1 The Special Officer under Tenancy Act-cum-Principal District Munsif, Tenali, Guntur District. Tenali, Guntur District.
2. 2CCs to Government Pleader for Endowments, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT)
3. 2 CD copies.