Telangana High Court

WP/25112/2004 of Mungara Suryanarayana Vs The Managing Director on 31 December 2004

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 25112 of 2004 Between: Mungara Suryanarayana S/o.M.Nageswara Rao Bavayapalem,Krovidi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

WRIT PETITION NO : 25112 of 2004

Between:

Mungara Suryanarayana S/o.M.Nageswara Rao Bavayapalem,Krovidi Post, Nidamarru Mandal, West Godavari Dist.

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Managing Director Sree Guruvayurppan Swamy Oils, Bavayapalem, Krovvidi, Via.Ganapavaram, West Godavari Dist.

2 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur Dist.

3 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to order in IA No.168/2003 in IDNo.371/92, dt 17-11-2004 passed by the presiding officer, Labour court, Guntur andto quash the same and consequentially to direct to restore proceedings inID.No.371/92 on the file of the presiding officer,Labour Court, Guntur.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENUGOPALA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR LABOUR

The Court at the stage of admission, made the following :

ORDER:

Page 1 of 2

This writ petition is totally devoid of merit. The order under challengedoes not suffer from any legal infirmities so as to call for anyinterference by this Court.

The I.D.No.371 of 1992 dated 19.4.2000 was dismissed on theground that the petitioner was not evincing any interest at all for morethan one year. Thereafter, after lapse of three years, the presentI.No.168 of 2003 in I.D.No.371 of 1992 is filed. Therefore, the 2[nd]respondent passed appropriate orders and the orders underchallenge do not suffer from any legal infirmities so as to call for anyinterference by this Court.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

____________

31.12.2004

bsv

1 The Managing Director Sree Guruvayurppan Swamy Oils, Bavayapalem, Krovvidi, Via.Ganapavaram, West Godavari Dist.

2 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur Dist.

3 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur

4. 2 CCs to the Government Pleader Labour, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)

5. 2 CD copies

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…