Telangana High Court

WP/25116/2004 of Jitta Venkata Subbarao, Vs The Managing Director, Sree Guruvayurappan - on 31 December 2004

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 25116 of 2004 Between: Jitta Venkata Subbarao, S/o. Sathyanarayana, R/o. Bavayapalem

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

WRIT PETITION NO : 25116 of 2004

Between:

Jitta Venkata Subbarao, S/o. Sathyanarayana, R/o. Bavayapalem Krovidi Post, Nidamarru mandal, West Godavari District.

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Managing Director, Sree Guruvayurappan - Swamy Oils Food & Facts Ltd., Bavayapalem Krovvidi, Via Ganapavaram, West Godavari District. Bavayapalem Krovvidi, Via Ganapavaram, West Godavari District.

2 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toIssue writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to order in I.A.No.165/2003 inI.D.No.369/1992, dt. 17.11.2004 passed by the presiding Officer, Labour Court,Guntur and to quash the same and consequentially to direct the restore proceedingsin I.D.No.369/1992 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur andpass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENUGOPALA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR

The Court made the following :

Page 1 of 2

ORDER:

This writ petition is totally devoid of merit. The order under challengedoes not suffer from any legal infirmities so as to call for anyinterference by this Court.

The I.D.No.369 of 1992 dated 19.4.2000 was dismissed on theground that the petitioner was not evincing any interest at all for morethan one year. Thereafter, after lapse of three years, the presentI.A.No.165 of 2003 in I.D.No.369 of 1992 is filed. Therefore, the 2[nd]

respondent passed appropriate orders and the orders underchallenge do not suffer from any legal infirmities so as to call for anyinterference by this Court.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

____________

31.12.2004

bsv

2 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur.

3. Two CD copies

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…