Telangana High Court
WP/27769/2005 of M/s.Pavan Granite Metal Works, Vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner cum Enquiring- on 28 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.27769 OF 2005 Dated: 28-12-2005 Between M/s Pavan Granite Metal Works, Jupudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Rep. by its Proprietor Sri Chintala Rama Mohan Rao, S/o. Venakteswara Rao R/o. Jupudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.27769 OF 2005
Dated: 28-12-2005
Between
M/s Pavan Granite Metal Works,
Jupudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal,
Rep. by its Proprietor Sri Chintala Rama Mohan Rao, S/o. Venakteswara Rao R/o. Jupudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District.
…PETITIONER
AND
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner cum Enquiring Authority, Under Section 7A of the Act, Office of the Regional P.F. Commissioner 3[rd] lane, Krishna Nagar, Guntur.
…RESPONDENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing forthe respondent.
The petitioner questions the impugned order dated 25.08.2005 made under Section 14-Band 7-Q of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (forshort ‘the Act’) issued by the respondent.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to file an appeal before the appropriate Tribunal against theimpugned order, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder, and if any such appeal is filed, there shall be stay of recovery of the demandedamount in question, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits half of the demandedamount, within a period of four weeks from today.
With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
______________
V. ESWARAIAH, J