Telangana High Court
WP/45979/2016 of Peda Prajala Seva Samithi, Vs The Central Government of India, on 30 December 2016
SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.45979 of 2016 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the pending Grant-in-Aid for the years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 and
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.45979 of 2016
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the pending Grant-in-Aid for the years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 and not revival all the programs conducted by petitioner’s organization as per A.P. State Government specific recommendation Letter No.2379/Bud-2/2006-3, dated 18.02.2009, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to release the pending Grant-in-Aid for the years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 and revival all the programs conducted by petitioner’s organization as per recommendation of State Government basing on the District Collector’s Inspection Report vide Letter No.2379/Bud-2/2006-3, dated 18.02.2009.
Heard and perused the material available on record.
The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner organization is registered under the name and style of “Peda Prajala SEva Samithi” under the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 bearing Registration No.320/1988 and that the aims and objects of organization is to help socially and economically weaker section of society, more particularly, women and children. The 1[st] respondent had sanctioned to run residential school during the year 1992-93 and the petitioner organization has also got sanction for conducting two old age homes in the year 1993-94, computer training for 30 SC trainees in the year 1994, type-writing and short-hand training for 50 SC trainees in the year 1995-96 and for conducting vocational training and rehabilitation programme for 30 disabled persons in the year 1998-99 respectively and that the 1[st]respondent has issued sanctions for all those programmes basing on the Joint Committee Inspection consisting of the District, State and Central Government Officials as per G.O.Rt.No.54 and released the grant-in-aid for the years 2000-2001, 2001-2002 and released 1[st] instalment for the year 2002-03 and that no amount was released to the Short Stay Home Programme, except sanctioned letter given by the 2[nd] respondent in the year 1999-2000 and that the Central Social Welfare Board has placed the petitioner’s Short Stay Home for woman and girls in black list basing on the forgery signature Inspection Reports of the District Collector, Chittoor and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, in CB/1, dated 30.06.1999.
Page 1 of 2
The main grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has submitted representations, dated 16.08.2002 and 13.07.2016, to the 1[st]respondent requesting to release the pending Grant-in-Aid for the years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 and revival all the programs conducted by petitioner’s organization as per recommendation of State Government specific basing on the District Collector’s Inspection Report vide Letter No.2379/Bud-2/2006-3, dated 18.02.2009, but so far, the same are not considered and disposed of by the 1[st] respondent.
Considering the said facts and circumstances, the 1[st] respondent is directed to consider the representations, dated 16.08.2002 and 13.07.2016, submitted by the petitioner and dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, more preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________
RAJA ELANGO,J
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…