Telangana High Court
WP/34479/2011 of Menda Thavitamma, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principle on 29 December 2011
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34479 of 2011 Date: 29.12.2011 Between: Menda Thavitamma and 49 others. ..... Petitioners And: Government of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.34479 of 2011
Between:
Date: 29.12.2011
Menda Thavitamma and 49 others.
And:
..... Petitioners
Government of A.P., Reptd by itsPrincipal Secretary, Revenue Department,Hyderabad and two others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri M.Viswanadham Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioners in this Writ Petition isthat even though the issue relating to fixation of marketvalue of the acquired lands for passing an award underSection 11(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, wasreferred to State Level Negotiation Committee, respondentNo.2 herein, the said respondent has not taken anydecision so far.
At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleaderfor Land Acquisition, representing the respondents, oninstructions, stated that as a consensus could not be reached for fixation of the market value at the District LevelNegotiation Committee, the issue was proposed to bereferred to respondent No.2, and that, as certain aspectsneeded to be clarified, the Chairman of the District LevelNegotiation Committee, i.e., the District Collector, hasreferred the file to respondent No.3 for giving clarificationand that the file is now pending with respondent No.3.
In the light of the grievance of the petitioners that therespondents are not acting with reasonable dispatch,respondent No.3 is directed to place the file before theDistrict Collector, who is the Chairman of the District LevelNegotiation Committee, after giving the required clarification,within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of acopy of this order. The District Collector, Srikakulam, shall,within two weeks thereafter, forward the file to respondentNo.2 and within one month after receipt of the file,respondent No.2 shall complete the process and return thesame to respondent No.3 for passing appropriate award.
Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition,W.P.M.P.No.42913 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interimrelief is disposed of as infructuous.
__________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J29[th] December 2011DR