Telangana High Court
CRP/5811/2006 of Vejella Venugopala Rao, Vs Muvva Venakta Subbayamma, on 28 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5811 of 2006 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the subject matter of the revision petition has become infructuous. 2. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5811 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the petitioner represented that the subject matter of therevision petition has become infructuous.
2. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition isdismissed as infructuous. No costs.
______________________
December 28, 2006
KVR