Telangana High Court
WA/2038/2004 of T. Garuthmanth Raju, Vs A.P. Tranco represented by its on 22 December 2006
MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO.2038 of 2004 22nd December 2006 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30.11.2004 in W.P.NO.16441 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: T.Garuthmanth Raju,
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.2038 of 2004
22[nd] December 2006
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Orderdated 30.11.2004 in W.P.NO.16441 OF 2002 on the file of the HighCourt.)
Between:
T.Garuthmanth Raju, S/o.Krishnam Raju, 36 years, Occ.AssistantDivisional Engineer (District Stores), APNPDCL, Karimnagar Circle,Karimnagar, I.D.No.1015744.
…APPELLANT
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A.P.Transco, represented by its GeneralManager (Personnel),Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.
And five others.
…RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.2038 of 2004
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao)
The counsel on either side represented that the matter has been settled out of Court and seeks to withdraw the Writ Appeal.
Recording the same, permission is accorded.
The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
_________________
(B.PRAKASH RAO, J)
_______________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
22[nd] December 2006RRB