Telangana High Court

CCCA/298/2004 of A.P.S.R.T.C. Staff Benevolent-cum-Thrift Fund Vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., on 31 December 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 298 OF 2004 Appeal under

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILIANDTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 298 OF 2004

Appeal under section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated2B-7-2004 made in OS No. 816 of 2000 on the file of the Vll Senior Civil Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

A.P.S.R.T.C. Staff Benevolent-cum-Thrift Fund, rep. by its Secretary RTC XRoads Mushirabad Hyderabad.

..APPELLANT

AND

1 The New lndia Assurance Co. Limited, Divisional Manager Divisional [Office]9th Floor Parishrama Bhavan basheerbagh9th Floor Parishrama Bhavan basheerbagh

2. The New lndia Assurance Co. Limited, General [Manager. ]New [lndia]Assurance Building, 87, M.G. Road, Fort, Bontbay.Assurance Building, 87, M.G. Road, Fort, Bontbay.

, ..RESPONDENTS

counsel for the Appellant: Sri A. V. Sivaiah (Not Present)

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Kota Subba Rao The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT:

HON'BLIi SRIJUSTICE [ABHINAND ][KUMAR ][SHAVILI]ANDIION'BL[ SRI JUS'IICE [LAXMI ][NARAYANA ][ALISHETTY]

C.C.C.A.No.298 O[F ][2004]

IUDGMENT [(/'er ][Ilon'blc ][Sti ][Jrtstice ][Abhinznd Kumar ][Shauili)]

Oo 17.1?..2024, none [aPpeared ][for ][the ][aPpellant ][and ][no]

Page 1 of 2

representation [was ][rnade ][on ][its ][behalf ][and ][hence, ][the ][matter]was directed to be [listed ][on ][3I.12.2024 ][under ][the ][caption ]["for]dismissal". [Today also, ][none ][aPPears ][and ][there ][is ][no]representation on behalf [of ][the ][appellant. ][Fbnce, ][this Coun ][has]no other option excePt [to ][dismiss ][the ][appeal ][for ][non-]Prosecution.

Accordingly, the [Appeal ][is ][dismissed ][for]

non-Prosecuti, [rn, ]No [costs.]

Miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][pending][ shall stand ][closed.]Sd,. T. KRISHNAUTY REG//TRUE [COPY//]

Sd,. T. KRISHNAKUMARUTY REGISTRAR

SEGTION [OFFICER]

To,1.TheVllsenior()rvrlJudge'CrtyCivilCourt.Hyderabad.(withrecords,ifany)r [V ][siviran ][Aivocate ][[oPUC-I. ][. ]^-2d;:, c-bi; i;; J.ffi ;; i" [5ii ][r ]Subra Rao [Advocate ][[oPUC]]4.Two CD [CoPies]"t, VH/gh €

HIGH COURI'

DATED: 3111212024

JUDGMENT

CCCA.No.298 of 2004

DISMISSING CCCA FORNON.PROSECUTIOITI

G)Vtr\x-

\e>

R[1][ i{ ][t-- ][ST4][ 16-]oti'.01 |']li 2[25zo\.)a'or .l1:[o]

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead