Telangana High Court
WP/22519/2023 of AMRADI MANIKYAM Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :22519 OF 2023 Between: Amradi Manik Business Velc ya ha AND '1. The and
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE [OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY [NINTH ][DAY OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND [TWENTY THREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [C.V. ][BHASKAR ][REDDY]
WRIT PETITION NO:22519 OF [2023]
Between:
Amradi Manikyam, Amradi Manikyam [age ][29 ][years ][1-54, ][Osmanpura, Occ]Business Velchal, Mominpet, RangareddY, [T.S ][-501202]
...PETITIONER
AND
'1. TheState of Telangana, [Represented ][by ][its ][Principal ][Secr-etary' Prohibition]andExcise Department, Secretariat, [Hyderabad, ][Telangana ][State.]andExcise Department, Secretariat, [Hyderabad, ][Telangana ][State.]2. rheDirector, Prohibition and [Excise, ][N-ampally, ][Hyderabad, ][Telangana- ][State]3. TheCommissioner, Prohibition [and ][Excise ][Department, ][M ][J ][Market']Hyderabad. Telangana3. TheCommissioner, Prohibition [and ][Excise ][Department, ][M ][J ][Market']Hyderabad. Telangana4TheDy Commiss"ioner, Prohibition [and ][Excise ][Department, ][M ][J ][Market,]HyderabadHyderabad
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 [o1 ][lhe ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in [the ][affidavit ][filed ][therewith, ][the High'court ][may ][be]pleased to issue a writ, order or direction [or more particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature]of writ of Mandamus, [declaring ][action ][of ][the ][respondents ][in ][issuing ][the]notification vide G,O.Ms [No 86 ][dt ][O1-O8-2O23 ][is ][illegal, arbitrary, contrary ][to ][law]aM violative of the [principles ][of ][natural ][justice]
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section [151 ][CPC ][praying ][that ][in][ the ][circumstances ][stated]in the affidavit filed in support [of the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may be pleased ][to]stay the notification [vide G.O.Ms ][No 86 dt ][01-08-2023]
Counsel for the Petitioner: [SRl. KOTHA UDAY KIRAN REDDY](NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: [GP FOR PROHiBITION ][EXCISE]
The Court made the [following: ][ORDER]
/
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI'STICE C.V. BHASI(AR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.225t9 0F 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 22.12.2023, there was norepresentation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter wasdirected to be listed on 29.12.2023 under the caption "fordismissal". Even today also, there is no representation for thepetitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested inprosecuting the writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writpetition shall stand closed.petition shall stand closed.
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBAASSISTANT REGISTRAR Isecn&6rrtcen [I]
//rRUE coPY//
to,r. ,*o ccs to Gp FoR pRoHrBrroN EXCI.E ,High court for the state ofTelangana, at Hyderabad [OUTIz. one ct io'Snr.'(oirln [oDAYKIRAN ][REDDY, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]3. Two CD [CoPies]BMGJP
YY
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
WP.No.22519 of 2023
!.,,ut=.**c./s.aLJar\JHcH+
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FORNON.PROSECUTTON WITHOUT COSTS
G [C(f"t]
ft*